DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc., 175 So. 157.

18 citing documents.

  • Carter v. Baver 821 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Davidson v. American Drug Store [Stores]
  • Lebleu v. Southern Silica of Louisiana 554 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Williams v. Gervais F. Favrot Co. 499 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • Gardere v. Deffez 241 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Kraft v. U. Koen & Company, La.App., ; , 162 ; 38 Am.
  • Driscoll v. Allstate Insurance Co. 223 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    Glatt v. Hinton, La.App., ; Kraft v. U. Koen & Company, La.App., ; Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., ; Am.Jur., Negligence § 224.
  • Glatt v. Hinton 205 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    Kraft v. U. Koen & Company, La.App., ; ; 38 Am.Jur., Negligence, § 224; Prosser Torts 3rd Ed. HB pp. 441, 442.
  • Truitt v. B & G Crane Service, Inc. 165 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    *877 713); Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc., ; Merritt v. E. L. Bruce Co., La.App., 166 So.
  • McCutchen v. Fruge 132 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Orleans, ; Gallaher v. Ricketts, La.App.
  • Amyx v. Henry & Hall 79 So. 2d 483 La. 1955
    [5] Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc., La.App., ; Taylor v. Victoria Nav.
  • Miller v. Wyatt Lumber Mfg. Co. 3 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    508 ; Gallaher v. Ricketts, supra; Taylor v. Victoria Navigation Company, supra; Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc., La.App., .
  • Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. Standard Coffee Co. 2 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc., La.App., .
  • Fontenot v. Freudenstein 199 So. 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    In Davidson v. American Drug Stores, Inc., La.App., , there were presented facts showing that a pedestrian was injured because of the negligence of himself and of a passing motorcyclist, each in failing to discover the other, and, in a “concurring” opinion, the majority of the members of this court, believing that the Supreme Court in the Rottman case, supra, had indic
  • Rector v. Allied Van Lines, Inc. 198 So. 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    145 ; Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., ; Hantel v. Service Drayage Co., La.App., 177 So.
  • Litton v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, Inc. 195 So. 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    244 ; and Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., .
  • Gallaher v. Ricketts 187 So. 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    The facts of this case are strikingly similar to those in Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., .
  • Shipp v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. in Trusteeship 188 So. 526 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    81 ; Iglesias v. Campbell, La.App., 175 So; 145; Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., ; Hantel v. Service Drayage Co., La.
  • Hantel v. Service Drayage Co. 177 So. 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    Davidson v. American Drug Stores, La.App., ; Hicks v. Texas & N. O. R. R. Co., 186 La.
  • Taylor v. Victoria Nav. Co. 176 So. 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937