Hart v. Hart
Hart v. Hart, 460 So. 2d 1129 (La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984).
Cited by
- Niyokey Torregano, Wife of/and Courtney Torregano v. James Cohen, Corey Stewart and Abc Insurance … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
- Dauzat v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. of Kansas 670 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Opinion text
MARVIN, Judge. Mr. Hart, who is embroiled in divorce litigation with his wife in Texas, appeals a judgment denying his demands in a rule to show cause against his wife’s parents why they should not be cast for $625 costs incurred by him because of their failure to *1130 appear, when subpoenaed, for the purpose of giving depositions. Appellant erroneously bases his rule on CCP Art. 1473. The sanctions of that article, however, do not apply to a deponent who is not a party or who is not designated to be a deponent by an organization that is a party. Compare Art. 1447. Appellant’s in-laws are not parties. Hart has no cause of action against them for his expenses caused by their alleged disobedience. CCP Arts. 927, 934. A witness-deponent who disobeys a subpoena for a deposition is subject only to the contempt authority of the court. See CCP Art. 1357 and comment (d) thereunder. Appellant’s in-laws were not cited for contempt. At appellant’s cost, the judgment denying and dismissing his demands is AFFIRMED.