DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duplain v. Wiltz, 174 So. 652.

29 citing documents.

  • Travis Lee Stevens v. Darren Keith Bruce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    587; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra (La.App., ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., 135 La.
  • Stevens v. Bruce 878 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    587 [(1935)]; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra (La.App.[1937], ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., 135 La.
  • Powell v. Dorris 814 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra (La.App., ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., 135 La.
  • Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 511 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra, [ (La.App.Orl.
  • Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. STATE EX REL. DIV. OF ADMIN. 486 So. 2d 95 La. 1986
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra (La.App., ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M.R. Co., 135 La.
  • Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance Company 336 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra, [ ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Hargroder v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. 290 So. 2d 874 La. 1974
    App., ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Pflieger v. Haws 180 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    732 , , compare Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., , * * *."
  • Barr v. Freeman 175 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra [La.App., ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Georgia Pacific Corp. v. B.G.M. Builders 154 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra [La.App., ] and LaCasse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Guenard v. Key 131 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    The latter opinion cited with approval and designated as the leading case on point the decision rendered by the Orleans Court of Appeal in Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App.Orleans 1937, with Judge McCaleb as organ of the court.
  • Fontenot v. Great American Indemnity Company 127 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    The leading case which distinguishes the exception of no right of action from the exception of no cause of action is Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., Orleans 1937, , the reasoning in which has been approved by our Supreme Court in Rapides Grocery Company v. Vann, 230 La.
  • Smith v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. 124 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    We, therefore, are not in a position to pass upon the exception, and have noticed it merely for the purpose of again calling the attention of our brethren of the trial courts to the advisability and importance of disposing of such exceptions on the face of the papers, and not by referring them to the merits.” Also see Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., ; McGee v. Finley, La.App., ; Martino v. Fairburn, La.App., ; State ex rel.
  • Clark v. Town of Mandeville 105 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra (La.App., ) and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Liuzza v. Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury 101 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    App., 1 Cir., ; Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., Orleans, .
  • Richard v. National Surety Corporation 99 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    587 ; Duplein v. Wiltz, supra, La.App., and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co. 95 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    These cases all cite and rely on the studies of a leading authority upon Louisiana procedure, Dean Henry G. McMahon, and upon the famous leading decision of Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App.Orleans., , which at page 655 states: "The right to sue is conferred either by statute or the jurisprudence, whereas the cause to sue is legally determined after investigation of the facts presented."
  • Wischer v. Madison Realty Company 92 So. 2d 589 La. 1956
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra [La.App., ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Rapides Grocery Company v. Vann 89 So. 2d 359 La. 1956
    The leading case which has been quoted by all the appellate courts of this state with approval on numerous occasions is the case of Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., , which properly states the functions of the exceptions of no right and that of no cause of action as follows: “The right to sue is conferred either by statute or the jurisprudence, whereas the cause to sue is legally determined after investigation of the facts presented.” *841 After reviewing the jurisprudence a
  • Rapides Grocery Co. v. Vann 84 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    The point was tendered for the consideration of our brethren of the Orleans Court in the case of Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., .
  • Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Co. 82 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, supra [La.App., ] and La Casse v. New Orleans, T. & M. R. Co., 135 La.
  • Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. Saint Denis Securities Co. 72 So. 2d 257 La. 1954
    732 , , compare Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., , and (2) the authority of Jones to bind the defendant corporation for the sale of its real estate without a. mandate in writing was not merely a. matter of defense but one vital to plaintiff’s cause of action.
  • Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Theard 62 So. 2d 501 La. 1952
    See Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., and cases there cited.
  • Rheuark v. Terminal Mud & Chemical Co. 35 So. 2d 592 La. 1948
    Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., .
  • City of Gretna v. Gulf Distilling Corporation 17 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    If objection had been made on the latter ground, we would have been obliged to sustain it on the authority of Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., .
  • Bartholomew v. Impastato 12 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    587 ; Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., and La Casse v. N.O., T. M.R. Co., 135 La.
  • Overruled Duplain v. Wiltz 194 So. 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    The facts in this case are stated at length in our opinion in Duplain v. Wiltz, La.App., , where we overruled an exception of no cause of action and remanded the case to the District Court for a hearing on the merits.
  • Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 190 So. 565 La. 1939
    In support thereof plaintiff relies particularly on the recent decision of the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans, , and the authorities therein discussed (in which case we denied application for writ of certiorari), and an excerpt from the case of Eastman v. Benton, 184 La.
  • Alsaya v. Johnson 178 So. 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    we said: “It has also been held * * * that evidence destructive of plaintiff’s right may be received on trial of an exception of no right of action.” See, also, Soniat et al. v. White, Tax Collector, et al., 153 La.