DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Friede v. Myles Salt Co., 177 So. 105.

18 citing documents.

  • Mini Togs Products, Inc. v. Wallace 513 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    1050 , (1968); (Orl.La.App.1937)."
  • New Orleans v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. 517 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    1050 , ; (Orl.La.App.1937)."
  • Meeks v. Huntington School, Inc. 489 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    1050 , (1968); (Orl.La.App.1937)."
  • Land and Offshore Co. v. Martin 469 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    1050 , (1968); (Orl.La.App.1937)."
  • Magnolia Const. Co., Inc. v. Causey 421 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Alexander v. Burroughs Corp. 359 So. 2d 607 La. 1978
    1050 , (1968); (Orl.La.App.1937).
  • Brummett v. Hamel's Dairy, Inc. 324 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Art. 1938 and Friede v. Myles Salt Co., Ltd., Pease v. Gatti, 205 La.
  • James, Robinson, Felts & Starnes v. Powell 303 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    See also Friede v. Myles Salt Company, La.App., (Orl.
  • Wurzlow v. Placid Oil Company 279 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    In reaching this conclusion the Louisiana Supreme Court cited from and quoted with approval the case of Friede v. Myles Salt Company, Ltd., as follows: "In the case of Friede v. Myles Salt Company, Limited, 177 So.
  • Calhoun v. Louisiana Materials Co. 206 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    art. 1938; Friede v. Myles Salt *152 Co., La.App., ; Grosz v. Baton Rouge Realty Co., La.App., .
  • Pittman and Matheny v. Davidge 189 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    See Friede v. Myles Salt Co., La.App., .
  • Philips v. Frank 143 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Insofar as interest is concerned plaintiff relies upon Code of Practice Article SS4 and LSA-Civil Code Article 1938, both of which provide that, unless otherwise stipulated, interest at the rate of S'% shall be allowed on all debts from the time they become due, and some of the jurisprudence, including Friede v. Myles Salt Co., La.App., , and Carey v. Sentell, La.App., , holding that a claim for professional services becomes due upon the completion of such services and interest begins to run fro
  • Culpepper v. Slater 131 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Orleans, 1937, , plaintiff claimed a balance due for services rendered to defendant in the preparation of a traffic study involving transportation of its products from its mines at Weeks Island.
  • Carey v. Sentell 64 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    Friede v. Myles Salt Co., La.App., .
  • Pease v. Gatti 18 So. 2d 511 La. 1944
    In the case of Friede v. Myles Salt Company, Limited, , the Court of Appeal of the Orleans Circuit considered a question very similar to the one here presented, and it appropriately and correctly observed that: “We note that prior to 1839, interest was not allowed on accounts or unliquidated claims.
  • Grosz v. Baton Rouge Realty Co. 17 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    See Friede v. Myles Salt Co., Ltd., La.App., .
  • Boelte v. West 185 So. 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    See Friede v. Myles Salt Company, Ltd., La.App., ; C.P.
  • Handelman's Chain Stores v. Maryland Casualty Co. 184 So. 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Friede v. Myles Salt Co., Ltd., La.App., .