Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Royal Ins. Co. v. Collard Motors, Inc., 179 So. 108.

18 citing documents.

Bond v. Helmer 215 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Baker v. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INSURANCE CO. 201 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
Rancatore v. Evans 182 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Co., Limited, of Liverpool, England v. Collard Motors, La.App., .
Fireman's Fund Indemnity Company v. Sigard 129 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Co., Limited of Liverpool, England v. Collard Motors, Inc., La.App., .
Steadman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Company 113 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Co. v. Collard Motors, La.App., ; Dotson v. Louisiana Cent.
Plummer v. Motors Insurance Corporation 96 So. 2d 605 La. 1957
Co., Limited, of Liverpool, England v. Collard Motors, La.App., ; Koerner v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., La.App., .
Niagara Fire Insurance v. Shuff 93 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The facts as presented in the Wood case, supra, are similar to those in the cases of Royal Insurance Co., Ltd., of Liverpool, England v. Collard Motors, La.App., ; Jones v. Shell Petroleum Corporation, 185 La.
Hazel v. Williams 80 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
443 ; Royal Insurance Company, Ltd. of Liverpool, England, v. Collard Motors, Inc., La.App.1938, ; Colgin v. Security Storage & Van Co., Inc., La.App.
Carter v. Middleton 76 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Co. v. Collard Motors, Inc., ; Gulf Ins.
Leigh v. Johnson-Evans Motors 75 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Co., Limited, of Liverpool, England, v. Collard Motors, Inc., La.App., , the stipulation of facts of which showed *716 that plaintiff's insured delivered to defendant his Dodge automobile for servicing and that while said automobile was in defendant's possession it was destroyed by fire.
Pacific Fire Ins. v. Eunice Motor Car Co. 46 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
uke case, was of the opinion as shown by the following quotes, that in certain cases for the bailee to escape liability he must show the cause of the fire: “Where such a fire occurs, and it is confined within the interior of the premises of the bailee, it is its duty to show all facts of which it has or ought to’have knowledge and, as we said in Royal Insurance Company v. Collard Motors, La.App., , ‘these facts must not involve negligence on (its) part.’ ” “It may well be that in many instances,
Stewart v. Palmisano 31 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., , considered liability for a fire which occurred in defendant's automobile repairing establishment.
Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. Eunice Motor Car Co. 30 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Luke v. Security Storage Van Co. 24 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App., , "these facts must not involve negligence on [its] part."
Watkins v. Gulf Refining Co. 20 So. 2d 273 La. 1944
Co. v. Collard Motors, La.App., ; Dotson v. Louisiana Cent.
Dupuy v. Graeme Spring Brake Service 19 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
we considered a claim by an owner against a bailee for damage caused by fire while the automobile, which was damaged, was in the bailee's establishment undergoing repairs.
Gulf Ins. Co. v. Temple 187 So. 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Wagner v. T. S. C. Motor Freight Lines, Inc. 181 So. 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Co. v. Collard Motors, La.App., and Jones v. Shell Petroleum Corporation, 185 La.