DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Ins. Co., 180 So. 855.

14 citing documents.

  • Cameron v. Bruce 981 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Co., Landis & Young v. Gossett & Winn, 178 So.
  • St. Mary Operating Company v. Matthew Joel Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Co., La.App., see Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe, 331 U.S. 586, 67 S.Ct.
  • St. Mary Operating Co. v. Guidry 954 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
    Co., La.App.1938, ; see Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe, 331 U.S. 586 , 67 S.Ct.
  • Reilly v. State 533 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • McDermott, Inc. v. M-Elec. & Const. Co., Inc. 496 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Co., La.App., ; see Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe, 331 U.S. 586 , 67 S.Ct.
  • Nini v. Sanford Brothers, Inc. 258 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    The court relied upon Ray v. Liberty In *651 dustrial Life Insurance Co., (La.App.Orl.
  • Davis v. Royal-Globe Insurance Companies 223 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    In deciding that the suit by the father for his son did interrupt prescription even though the father was without the procedural capacity to bring the suit, the Court cited with approval and quoted from the cases of Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Insurance Company, La.App., , 856 as follows: "`In 9 Tulane Law Review, page 286, in an article entitled "Prescription—Interruption" appears the following: "* * * Numerous cases have held that although there is some mistake as to the parties plaintiff,
  • Overruled Nettles v. Great American Insurance Company 155 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    This plea of prescription was overruled by the trial court on authority of Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 132 So. 2d 845 La. 1961
    Co., La.App., ; see Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe, 331 U.S. 586 , 67 S.Ct.
  • Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 126 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
    Co., La.App., , as holding that a statute regarding prescription was applicable to both statutory and contractual prescription.
  • Andrepont v. Ochsner 84 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
  • National Retailers Mut. Ins. v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. 51 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Cited by plaintiff is the case of Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Insurance Co., La.App., , in which the Court of Appeal of Orleans ruled that a plea of prescription would not be maintained against the plaintiff’s contention that the running of prescription was interrupted by an earlier suit “which fairly apprised the obligor of the existence of the claim, and that technical defects as to parties plai
  • Green v. Peoples Benev. Industrial Life Ins. Co. 5 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    845 ; Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Insurance Co., La.App., .
  • Turner v. Bankers Shippers Ins. Co., Ny 187 So. 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
    See Ray v. Liberty Industrial Life Insurance Co., La.App., , and cases there cited.