Cited by

59 citing documents.

Tarleton-Gaspard v. Malochee 133 So. 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
& Power Co. et al., , 53 So.
Motor Sales & Service, Inc. v. Grasselli Chemical Co. 131 So. 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Horrell v. Gulf & Valley Cotton Oil Co. 131 So. 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
A leading Louisiana case involving the application of the doctrine of “res ipsa loquitur” is Lykiardopoulo v. N. O. & C. R. Light & Power Co., , 53 So.
Livaudais v. Black 127 So. 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Lykiardopoulo vs. Railway Company, , 53 So.
Drago v. Dorsey 126 So. 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
In Lykiardopoulo vs. New Orleans & C. R. Light & Power Co., , 53 So.
Cusimano v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 122 So. 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
My associates cite Lykiardopoulo vs. New Orleans & C. R. Light & Power Co., , 53 So.
Lonatro v. Palace Theatre Co. 5 La. App. 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Idem; Lykiardopoulo vs. N. O. & C. R. Light & Power Co., , 53 So.
Barabin. v. Teche Transfer Co. 1 La. App. 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
Plaintiff first urges the doctrine of res wsa loquitur — that is to say, that a presumption of negligence arises from the fact itself of the accident, and relies in support of this contention on the case of Lykiardopoulo vs. New Orleans Light and Power Co., , 53 South.
Dotson v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. 80 So. 205 La. 1918
Lykiardopoulo v. N. O. & C. R. Light & Power Co., , 53 South.