Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duson v. Roos, 49 So. 590.
- Harper v. Celotex Corp. 183 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Succession of Caldwell 147 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
- British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Welsh v. Lagasse 128 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
- Jones v. Jones 121 So. 2d 734 La. 1960
-
Ewald v. Hodges
120 So. 2d 465
La. 1960
“(They) cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.” , 49 So.
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan 92 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
- Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. 82 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
-
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks
74 So. 2d 36
La. 1954
Duson, et al. v. Roos, et al., , 49 So.
-
Bridges v. Trevino
64 So. 2d 528
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
‘(They) cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.’ , 49 So.
-
Keller v. Haas
24 So. 2d 610
La. 1945
"(They) cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.” , 49 So.
-
Keller v. Haas
12 So. 2d 238
La. 1943
In the case of Skannal v. Hespeth, supra, , 49 So.
- Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 190 So. 359 La. 1939
- Tyson v. York 188 So. 33 La. 1939
-
Boutwell v. Gunter
185 So. 690
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Voicing the opinion of the Supreme Court, , 49 So.
-
Thrift Homestead Ass'n v. Palmisano
154 So. 753
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1934
“ ‘A purchaser of real estate in good faith from the owner of record is not affected by equities which may have existed between former owners of the property and third persons, but which do not appear of record.’ , 49 So.
- Harrell v. Harrell 142 So. 138 La. 1932
-
Jackson Homestead Ass'n v. Zimmer
134 So. 126
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1931
“A purchaser of real estate in good faith from the owner of record is not affected by equities which may have existed between former owners of the property and third persons, but which do not appear of record.” , 49 So.
- Ramsey v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 123 So. 114 La. 1929
-
Flower v. Flower
7 La. App. 530
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
7, page 863, No. 7, et seq.; Duson vs. Rood, , 49 South.
-
Doiron v. Lock, Moore & Co.
115 So. 366
La. 1927
‘[They,] cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property, will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.’ , 49 So.
-
Vaughn v. Kemp
4 La. App. 682
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
C’s title to the property is good, because Article 2266 of the Code provides that: “All sales,- contracts and judgments affecting immovable property, which shall not be so recorded, shall be utterly null and void, except between the parties thereto.” ' In the case of Duson vs. Roos, , 49 South.
- Burch v. Theriot 6 Pelt. 351 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1923
- Cooper v. Edwards 92 So. 721 La. 1922
- Vestal v. Producers' Oil Co. 66 So. 334 La. 1914
- Miller v. Vivian Oil Co. 60 So. 236 La. 1912
- Gulf Refining Co. v. Jeems Bayou Hunting & Fishing Club 57 So. 322 La. 1912
- Bender v. Chew 56 So. 1023 La. 1911
- Washington v. Filer 54 So. 128 La. 1911