Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jeanerette Rice & Milling Co. v. Durocher, 48 So. 780.
-
FLUIDAIR PROD., INC. v. Robeline-Marthaville Water System
465 So. 2d 969
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Jeanerette Rice & , 48 So.
-
Gerde v. Simonson Investments, Inc.
197 So. 2d 754
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
The statutory requirements are sacramental; failure to-comply therewith renders the resolution-under consideration void and of no effect, and strikes with nullity the ensuing contract.” The Supreme Court in Jeanerette Rice & ,.
-
Buckley v. Woodlawn Development Corporation
98 So. 2d 92
La. 1957
448; Jeanerette Rice & , 48 So.
-
Acadian Production Corp. v. Savanna Corp.
63 So. 2d 141
La. 1953
This may be done after a motion to dismiss has been made, but not after an actual dismissal.” The authorities cited by defendant in ■supplemental brief, Jeanerette Rice & , 48 So.
-
Jones v. Shreveport Lodge No. 122
60 So. 2d 889
La. 1952
448; Jeanerette Rice & , 48 So.
-
Commercial Nat. Bank v. Henderson
173 So. 790
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1937
Jeanerette Rice & , 48 So.
-
Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Lichtenteg
118 So. 773
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
True, it can act only through agents, it being a mere juridical person; but, inasmuch as it has the capacity to stand in judgment for itself, what necessity is there for naming these agents in the petition?” In Jeanerette Rice & Milling Co. vs. Durocher, , 48 So.
-
Supreme Grand Lodge v. Givens
7 La. App. 571
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Jeanerette Rice Milling Co. vs. Durocher, , 48 So.
-
Reiman Co. v. Board of Commissioners
3 La. App. 663
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
236 ; Jeanerette Rice & Milling Company vs. Durocher, , 48 South.
-
Miller v. St. Marks Baptist Church
104 So. 121
La. 1925
827 ; Jeanerette Rice & , 48 So.
-
World's Panama Exposition Co. v. American Brewing Co.
64 So. 832
La. 1914
Jeanerette Rice & , 48 South.
-
Layne & Bowler Co. v. Town of Winnfield
64 So. 127
La. 1914
In Jeannerette Rice & , 48 South.
-
Bradshaw v. Knoll
61 So. 839
La. 1913
His power as agent must be delegated directly in the organic law of the corporation or through the board of directors.” , 48 South.
- Pardee Co. v. H. Alfrey Heading Co. 56 So. 660 La. 1911
-
White Hall Agr. Co. v. Police Jury
54 So. 337
La. 1911
All corporations being on the same footing in this respect, the case of Jeanerette Rice & , 48 South.