Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Duson v. Roos, 49 So. 590.

29 citing documents.

Harper v. Celotex Corp. 183 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Succession of Caldwell 147 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Welsh v. Lagasse 128 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1961
Jones v. Jones 121 So. 2d 734 La. 1960
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
“(They) cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.” , 49 So.
Esso Standard Oil Company v. Jordan 92 So. 2d 377 La. 1956
Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. 82 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Marks 74 So. 2d 36 La. 1954
Duson, et al. v. Roos, et al., , 49 So.
Bridges v. Trevino 64 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
‘(They) cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.’ , 49 So.
Keller v. Haas 24 So. 2d 610 La. 1945
"(They) cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.” , 49 So.
Keller v. Haas 12 So. 2d 238 La. 1943
In the case of Skannal v. Hespeth, supra, , 49 So.
Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 190 So. 359 La. 1939
Tyson v. York 188 So. 33 La. 1939
Boutwell v. Gunter 185 So. 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Voicing the opinion of the Supreme Court, , 49 So.
Thrift Homestead Ass'n v. Palmisano 154 So. 753 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1934
“ ‘A purchaser of real estate in good faith from the owner of record is not affected by equities which may have existed between former owners of the property and third persons, but which do not appear of record.’ , 49 So.
Harrell v. Harrell 142 So. 138 La. 1932
Jackson Homestead Ass'n v. Zimmer 134 So. 126 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1931
“A purchaser of real estate in good faith from the owner of record is not affected by equities which may have existed between former owners of the property and third persons, but which do not appear of record.” , 49 So.
Ramsey v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 123 So. 114 La. 1929
Flower v. Flower 7 La. App. 530 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
7, page 863, No. 7, et seq.; Duson vs. Rood, , 49 South.
Doiron v. Lock, Moore & Co. 115 So. 366 La. 1927
‘[They,] cannot sleep upon this right, await developments, to see whether the property, will grow in value or not, and then exercise the rights or not, according to the event.’ , 49 So.
Vaughn v. Kemp 4 La. App. 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
C’s title to the property is good, because Article 2266 of the Code provides that: “All sales,- contracts and judgments affecting immovable property, which shall not be so recorded, shall be utterly null and void, except between the parties thereto.” ' In the case of Duson vs. Roos, , 49 South.
Burch v. Theriot 6 Pelt. 351 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1923
Cooper v. Edwards 92 So. 721 La. 1922
Vestal v. Producers' Oil Co. 66 So. 334 La. 1914
Miller v. Vivian Oil Co. 60 So. 236 La. 1912
Gulf Refining Co. v. Jeems Bayou Hunting & Fishing Club 57 So. 322 La. 1912
Bender v. Chew 56 So. 1023 La. 1911
Washington v. Filer 54 So. 128 La. 1911