Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reynolds v. Egan, 48 So. 940.

20 citing documents.

Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE 615 So. 2d 318 La. 1993
Potter v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Scotlandville 602 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 563 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Moore v. Cameron Parish School Bd. 511 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Landry v. St. Charles Inn, Inc. 446 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
4th Cir.1978); Bright v. Bell, 37 So.
Hall v. Park Dell Terrace Partnership 425 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Cassidy v. Billy M Corp. 396 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Gant v. Flint-Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University 359 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
art. 2703 absolves the lessor from liability for torts against the lessee committed by third persons who claim no right to the leased premises, , 48 So.
Robicheaux v. Roy 352 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
107 (La.App.Orl.1927); , 48 So.
Cane River Needle Art v. Reon, Inc. 335 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
McKinnon v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 262 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Brunies v. Police Jury of Parish of Jefferson 110 So. 2d 732 La. 1959
487, 490 , the court in the course of its opinion said: “If the premises have ceased to be fit for the use for which they were leased, and the work of restoration amounts to reconstruction and not to mere repairs, the lessee is entitled to revoke the lease.” , 48 So.
Claude Neon Federal Co. v. Meyer Bros., Inc. 150 So. 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
498 ; Minis v. Greco, No. 8175 Orleans App. (unreported) [see Louisiana and Southern Digest]; , 48 So.
McWilliams v. Harper 149 So. 437 La. 1933
McWilliams v. Harper 149 So. 437 La. 1933
Gulf Coal & Coke Co. v. Bingaman 6 La. App. 107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Reynolds vs. Egan, , 48 South.
Chryssoverges v. General Cigar Co. 111 So. 787 La. 1927
490 , the court, in the course of its opinion, said: “ ‘If the premises have ceased to be fit for the use for which they were leased, and the work of restoration amounts to reconstruction and not to mere repairs, the lessee is entitled to revoke the lease.’ “ , 48 So.
Dehan v. Youree 109 So. 498 La. 1926
490 , the court, in the course .of its opinion, said : “If the premises have ceased to be fit for the use for which they were leased, and the work' of restoration amounts to reconstruction and not to mere repairs, the lessee is entitled to revoke the lease.” , 48 So.
H. B. Stevens Co. v. Board of Adm'rs 68 So. 109 La. 1915
Egan v. Hotel Grunewald Co. 55 So. 750 La. 1910

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by