Cited by

679, 681 , wherein the sufficiency of the description in a tax deed to identify the land therein was at issue, the court said: “Such identification might be completed by proof, aliunde the title, of possession, by the vendor or vendee, or of any other relevant facts.” , 49 So.

Plaintiff, under existing circumstances, should have raised a direct issue by pleadings as to the illegality of the assessment and the tax sale.” , syllabus 1 and 2, 49 So.

401 , it was held: “If the property passed to the State under the adjudication to it, the original owners are not concerned in the legality of tax sales subsequently made.” See also Gouaux vs. Beaullieu, , 49 So.

In Bourke v. Hauffman, 2 Orleans App. 142, the court said: “Where there is no evidence in the record to show want of notice or any other defect, the presumptive validity of the tax title remains unrebutted.” , 49 So.

Gouaux vs. Beaullieu, , 49 South.

it cannot be said that another piece is thereby identified, assessed and advertised, and that any authority is thereby conferred on the sheriff or tax collector to sell such other piece for taxes; and as we have said without authority he cannot make a sale for taxes within the meaning either of Article 233 of the Constitution or of any other provision of law.” In the case of Gouatux vs. Beaulieu, , 49 South.

In the case of Gouaux vs. Beaulien, , the court reviews the jurisprudence on the question of description of property sold for taxes.