Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Woodward-Wight & Co. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., 49 So. 719.

21 citing documents.

Klein v. R.M. Homes, Inc. 424 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Ashley v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. 380 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
700 (1932); Woodward-Wight & Co. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
Fleur De Leis Apts v. DAVIDSON SASH, ETC. 364 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Cf. Woodward-Wright & Co., Ltd. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
White v. Martin GMC Trucks, Inc. 359 So. 2d 1094 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
Woodward-Wight & Co. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
McClendon v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 357 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
582 (La.Sup.Ct., 1910) and Woodward-Wight v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
Peoples Fur. & G. v. Carson Hicks/Friedrichs Ref., Inc. 326 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Woodward-Wight & Company v. Engel Land & Timber Company, , 49 So.
McLain v. Cuccia 259 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Beneficial Finance Co. v. Bienemy 244 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Dagenhart v. Robertson Truck Lines, Inc. 230 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
582 (La.Sup.Ct., 1910) and Woodward-Wight v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
Motorola Aviation Electronics, Inc. v. Louisiana Aircraft, Inc. 172 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Brown v. Dauzat 157 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Goff v. Dewey Olivier, Inc. 137 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Woodward-Wight & Co., Ltd. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co. (1909), , 49 So.
Delahoussaye v. Domingues Chevrolet, Inc. 137 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
led by them and dismissing the suit of plaintiff, Harry Delahoussaye, at his costs.” Plaintiff contends that prescription was interrupted under the jurisprudence which holds that if a vendor has knowledge of a defect and attempts to remedy it, then prescription will begin to run only from the time vendor abandons the attempt to repair defect; see Woodward-Wight & , 49 So.
Hermeling v. Whitmore 140 So. 2d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Woodward-Wight & Co. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
"In Woodward-Wight & Co. v. Engel Land & L. Co., , 49 So.
Mohana v. Woodall 69 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
We find the following expression by Justice Monroe in the case of Woodward-Wight & Co. v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
Greater New Orleans Homestead Ass'n v. Harvey 158 So. 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
1094 , , which was a suit on two notes given in payment for two “slddder” outfits, the defendant resisted payment on the ground that “there was a failure of consideration, in that the ‘skidders’ proved to be faulty in design.” It was contended that this defense could not be heard because the “skidders” had not been tendered
A. Baldwin Sales Co. v. Mitchell 142 So. 700 La. 1932
See Woodward-Wight & Co., Ltd., v. Engel Land & Lumber Co., , 49 So.
Bishop & Babcock Co. v. Martino 120 So. 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Bernin v. Guarino 5 Pelt. 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1921
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 71 So. 598 La. 1916
339 , the court held that prescription began to run only when the cause of action had— “manifested itself with sufficient certainty to be susceptible of proof in a court of justice.” In Woodward-Wight v. Engel Land & L. Co., , 49 South.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by