DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Black v. Rock Island, A. & L. R., 51 So. 82.

15 citing documents.

  • Blanchard v. Ogima 215 So. 2d 902 La. 1968
    *45 2nd Cir. 1934); Black v. Rock Island, A. & L. R. Co., , 51 So.
  • Harding v. Christiana 103 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Principal reliance is placed upon three cases: the Goldman case, cited above, Black v. Rock Island A. & L. Railway Co., 1909, , 51 So.
  • G'sell v. Cassagne 12 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
  • Maas v. Harvey 8 So. 2d 683 La. 1942
    The court distinguished the Oliphant case from Black v. Rock Island, etc., Railroad Company, , 51 So.
  • Matheny v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 181 So. 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Other cases bearing upon this question cited and relied on by appellees are: , 51 So.
  • Buisson v. Potts 156 So. 408 La. 1934
  • James v. J. S. Williams & Son, Inc. 150 So. 9 La. 1933
    101 , , 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 166; Cusimano v. A. S. Spiess Sales Co., 153 La.
  • Carriel v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. 147 So. 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    351 ; Black v. R. I. A. & L. R. Co., , 51 So.
  • James v. J. S. Williams & Son, Inc. 143 So. 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
  • Goldman v. Yellow Cab Co. 134 So. 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    However, neither the Cusimano nor the Bowles cases which appear to us as ample authority to sustain the position of plaintiff in this case have gone as far in holding the master liable for the acts of his servant as Black v. R. I. A. & L. R. Co., , 51 So.
  • Vuillemot v. August J. Claverie & Co. 125 So. 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
    In support of this contention plaintiff cites Black vs. Rock Island R. R. Co., , 51 So.
  • Blake v. Jefferson-St. Charles Transfer Co. 8 La. App. 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    “I am of opinion that neither the Transfer Company, nor its surety, can be held liable in this case.” In the case of Black vs. Rock Island A. & L. R. Co., , 51 So.
  • Atkins v. Points 88 So. 231 La. 1921
    While the employer bears an added responsibility where he places dangerous instrumentalities under the control of his employee, an automobile is not inherently dangerous so that its mere use will render the owner .liable for accidents by the one handling it.” , 51 South.
  • Marullo v. St. Pasteur 81 So. 403 La. 1919
  • Williams v. W. R. Pickering Lumber Co. 52 So. 167 La. 1910