Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rocques v. Freeman, 51 So. 68.

13 citing documents.

Owen v. Owen 336 So. 2d 782 La. 1976
Lewis v. Clay 60 So. 2d 78 La. 1952
Smith v. Courtney 192 So. 528 La. 1939
Article 2405 of the Revised Civil Code reads as follows: “At the time of the dissolution of the marriage, all effects which both husband and wife reciprocally possess, are presumed common effects or gains, unless it be satisfactorily proved which of such effects they brought in marriage, or which have been given them separately, or which they have respectively inherited.” , 51 So.
Cahow v. Hughes 169 So. 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Carter v. Bolden 127 So. 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Rocques vs. Freeman, , 51 So.
Philip Werlein, Ltd. v. Madsen 120 So. 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
65 , ; Bartels vs. Souchon, 48 La.
Armand v. Armand 8 La. App. 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
59 , ; Joco vs. Joco, 129 La.
Fortson v. Moseke 7 La. App. 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Loranger v. Citizens' Nat. Bank 111 So. 418 La. 1927
66 , , it is said that: • “The act yhieh is sought to be annulled in this case as a donation does not appear on its face to possess that character.
Tucker v. Angell 1 La. App. 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Plaintiff’s counsel cites: Rocques vs. Freeman, ; 51 South.
Welch v. Forest Lumber Co. 92 So. 400 La. 1922
937 ; Rocques v. Freeman, Sheriff, et al., , 51 South.
Waller v. Colvin 92 So. 328 La. 1922
Cox v. Busch-Everett Oil Co. 60 So. 256 La. 1912