No. 17,637
Precedential
Reversed in part.
Processed
Tucker v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co.
Tucker v. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co., 51 So. 689 (La. 1910).
Cited by
- Scott v. LeCompte 260 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Rayborn v. Smiley 253 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
- Robichaux v. Huppenbauer 245 So. 2d 385 La. 1971
- Gotreaux v. Gary 94 So. 2d 293 La. 1957
- Fontenot v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. 80 So. 2d 845 La. 1955
- Ryan v. Louisiana Soc. for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals 62 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Robertson v. Shipp 50 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
- Ellis v. Blanchard 45 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
- Borgnemouth Realty Co. v. Gulf Soap Corporation 31 So. 2d 488 La. 1947
- Devoke v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co. 30 So. 2d 816 La. 1947
- McGee v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co. 19 So. 2d 21 La. 1944
Opinion text
On Applications for Rehearing. In the application for a rehearing, the defendant and appellant, in the alternative, asks us to change the judgment to allow defendant 90 days from the decree within which to comply with the requirements of the decree as to making alterations. The delay is granted in accordance with defendant and appellee’s prayer. This change regarding time having been made by amending the decree, the application for a rehearing is refused, except as to the 90 days. The application of plaintiffs and appellants for a rehearing is, also, refused.