Schwing v. Dunlap
Schwing v. Dunlap, 51 So. 684 (La. 1910).
Cited by
- Augman v. City of Morgan City 914 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
- Augman v. City of Morgan City 864 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
- Owens v. Jackson 550 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
- LeBlanc v. LeBlanc 451 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
- State, Department of Highways v. McDonald 329 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
- Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America 201 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
- Schwing v. Dunlap 58 So. 162 La. 1912
Opinion text
On Application for Rehearing. The utterances in another decision, to which applicant for a rehearing refers, are not pertinent. The Stewart Case, cited in the above opinion. The decisions of this court established a difference between the right of appeal when recusation was ordered and when recusation was not ordered. As before stated, in the last-cited case, recusation was not refused. It was not appealable, while in the present case it is different; recusation was refused. In view of prior decisions, the reasoning and utterances do not apply in the present case. The two issues were different. After having given the subject careful attention, the court unanimously concluded it advisable to put an end to interminable delays in matter of recusation. Rehearing refused.