Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Maxwell-Yerger Co. v. Rogan, 51 So. 48.
- Oliver v. Isgitt 297 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Malloy v. Smith 129 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
-
Coffey v. Pickett
189 So. 461
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
These decisions, however, , 51 So.
- Regional Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Elston, Prince & McDade 183 So. 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
- Miami Corporation v. State 173 So. 315 La. 1936
- Succession of Ott 162 So. 642 La. 1935
- Succession of Israel 154 So. 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Straus v. City of New Orleans 118 So. 125 La. 1928
-
Hardee & Glaspie Co. v. Kelly B. F. Moore & Son
8 La. App. 502
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
OPINION Under the authority of the case of Flower & King vs. Skipwith, 45 Ann. 895, the judgment appealed from would be correct, but that case was expressly overruled in that of Maxwell-Yerger Co. vs. Rogan, , 51 So.
-
Succession of Williams
7 La. App. 465
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Maxwell-Yerger vs. Rogan, , 51 South.
- Louisiana Farm Bureau Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. Clark 107 So. 115 La. 1926
-
American Cotton Oil Co. v. Spiller Sugar Co.
108 So. 878
La. 1925
15 , , this court held that: “The recorded pledge of the furnisher of money and supplies primes all unrecorded and all subsequently recorded privileges of such furnishers.” The record discloses that the board of directors of the Spiller Sugar Company, Limited, did not expressly authorize the signing of any contracts of
- Cotonio v. Succession of Forestiere 104 So. 377 La. 1925