Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orient Ins. v. Board of Assessors, 50 So. 778.

21 citing documents.

Gisclair v. Louisiana Tax Commission 16 So. 3d 1132 La. 2009
Giron v. Housing Auth. of City of Opelousas 393 So. 2d 1267 La. 1981
869 , (1909); Bonfield v. Tichenor, 189 So.
Arquembourg v. Bourque 243 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Quarles v. Lewis 98 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
869 , ; Bonfield v. Tichenor, La.App.Orl., 189 So.
Price v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation 95 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
869, 870 , ); Robinson v. Hook, La.App., .
Wilson v. Brian 81 So. 2d 142 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Quarles v. Lewis 67 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
869 , , Also, it is provided in Article 1935 of the LSA-Civil Code of Louisiana that: “The damages due for delay in the performance of an obligation to pay money are called interest.
Thompson v. Varino 45 So. 2d 634 La. 1950
869 , , which was a specific performance action, this court said: “Attorney’s fees cannot be recovered in a case of this kind.” As authority for the demand plaintiff’s counsel relies on Bonfield v. Tichenor, La.
Davis v. Oaklawn, Inc. 31 So. 2d 837 La. 1947
869 , where a vendee obtaining a specific performance was permitted to recover the fruits and revenues produced by the property from the date he was entitled to the delivery of title.
Deboue v. Gillman 2 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Robinson v. Hook 1 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
[869] 870, .” There are isolated cases here and there in the jurisprudence of this state — most of them very old — in which this rule has been departed from.
Robinson v. Hook 1 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Bonfield v. Tichenor 189 So. 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
869 , , in which the Supreme Court said: “But we do not agree with our learned Brother below that the vendee must elect between suing for specific performance and suing for damages; and that, if he *638 chooses the former, he cannot claim damages.
Southern Amusement Co. v. City of Jennings 157 So. 720 La. 1934
Price v. Town of Ruston 148 So. 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
869 , authority for this doctrine.
Price v. Town of Ruston 139 So. 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
870 , , holding that the vendee in a suit for specific performance was entitled to recover as damages the amount of rent lost to him during the period when he was entitled to possession.
Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Canulette Shipbuilding Co. 113 So. 855 La. 1927
Constantin Refining Co. v. Day 85 So. 613 La. 1920
Manning v. Cohen 54 So. 700 La. 1911
Fitzpatrick v. Richardson 8 Teiss. 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1911
Orient Insurance Co. vs. Board of Assessors, .
Lisso & Bro. v. Police Jury 53 So. 566 La. 1910