Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Guillory v. Elms, 52 So. 767.

22 citing documents.

Mayo v. Stoessell 277 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
1022 , ; Guillory Vs. Elms, , 52 So.
Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Butler 99 So. 2d 129 La. 1958
Morris v. Hankins 188 So. 155 La. 1939
Morris v. Hankins 185 So. 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
Gayle v. Slicer 178 So. 498 La. 1938
decisions which maintain that, if a sale, made by a ,tax collector and purporting to be a sale for delinquent taxes, is not preceded by any assessment at all of the property intended to be assessed, the sale is absolutely null, and being not in reality a “tax sale,” is not protected by the peremption of 3 years, provided for in the Constitution, , 52 So.
Progressive Realty Co. v. Levenberg 149 So. 444 La. 1933
Progressive Realty Co. v. Levenberg 149 So. 444 La. 1933
Woosley v. Louisiana Saw Mill Co. 136 So. 31 La. 1931
Const. 1921, art. 10, § 11; , 52 So.
Close v. Rowan 130 So. 350 La. 1930
Meredith v. Tubre 120 So. 902 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1929
Guillory vs. Elms, , 52 So.
Blanchard v. Estate of Hy Garland 6 La. App. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Guillory vs. Elms, , 52 South.
Hovarth v. Eppling 6 La. App. 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
394 , the court said: “The lots assessed and sold are described as fronting on Elysian Fields Street, Delalondre owned no lots fronting on Elysian Fields Street.” In Guillory vs. Elms, , 52 South.
Marque v. Kolwe 5 La. App. 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
679 ; Guillory vs. Elms, , 52 So.
Stockbridge v. Martin 4 La. App. 410 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1926
In the case of Guillory vs. Elms, , 52 South.
Hollingsworth v. Schanland 99 So. 613 La. 1924
Eivers' Heirs v. Rankin's Heirs 90 So. 419 La. 1921
Mecom v. Graves 86 So. 917 La. 1921
Baldwin Lumber Co. v. Dalferes 70 So. 493 La. 1915
Schneidau v. New Orleans Land Co. 61 So. 225 La. 1912
Coleman v. Cousin 55 So. 686 La. 1911