Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jones v. Texas & P. Ry. Co., 51 So. 582.

50 citing documents.

Ford Motor Credit Company v. Dunham 25 So. 3d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Allied Shipyard, Inc. v. Edgett 868 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Stokes v. Oster Development, Inc. 807 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Parker v. Dr. X 704 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Gassen v. East Jefferson General Hosp. 687 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Lirette v. Roe 631 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
PREMIER BANK, NAT. ASS'N v. Stout 627 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N OF LAKE CHARLES v. Jones 620 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Braud v. New England Ins. Co. 562 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
Great American Insurance Co. v. Hibernia National Bank 506 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Olivier v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh 499 So. 2d 1330 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Rayne State Bank & Trust Co. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. 483 So. 2d 987 La. 1986
Owens v. Martin 449 So. 2d 448 La. 1984
Wiley v. Wiley 387 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Higginbotham v. Curry 373 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
McClendon v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 357 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Dean v. Hercules Incorporated 328 So. 2d 69 La. 1976
Heaslip v. Treen 318 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1975
Neyrey v. Lebrun 309 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Vanguard Underwrit. Ins. Co. v. Ray's Plumb. Co., Inc. 312 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Steel v. Aetna Life & Casualty 304 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Dagenhart v. Robertson Truck Lines, Inc. 230 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Lucas v. Commercial Union Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Saltalamacchia v. Strachan Shipping Corp. 156 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Pachi v. Kammer 130 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Radalec, Inc. 126 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Hernandez v. Harson 111 So. 2d 320 La. 1959
"In Jones v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co., , 51 So.
Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Marquette Casualty Co. v. Brown 97 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Home Ins. Co. v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 52 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
In Re Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. 23 So. 2d 63 La. 1945
Tucker v. Legette 8 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
McGuire v. Monroe Scrap Material Co. 180 So. 413 La. 1938
In Jones v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company, , 51 So.
Succession of Kretzer 174 So. 345 La. 1937
Reed v. Succession of Gibson 171 So. 43 La. 1936
Succession of Oliver 165 So. 318 La. 1936
601 ; Jones v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co., , 51 So.
Spyker v. International Paper Co. 138 So. 109 La. 1931
Bolden v. La. Ry. & Nav. Co. 133 So. 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Burglass v. Villere 129 So. 209 La. 1930
Prescription does not run pending the litigation thus provoked.!’ In Jones v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co., , 51 So.
McIlhenny v. Roxana Petroleum Corp. 122 So. 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1929
Jackson v. Texas & P. Ry. Co. 117 So. 805 La. 1928
The rule of law applicable to the case is stated in 17 O. J. § 185, p. 879, as follows, viz.: “The value of the animal at the time is the measure of damages where it is killed, or so injured that killing is made necessary.” The case of Jones v. Texas & Pacific R. Co., , 51 So.
Warn v. Mexican Petroleum Corp. 6 La. App. 55 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1927
547 , : “The uncertainty which precludes the coming into existence of a cause of action for damages, and which therefore prevents prescription from beginning to run, must not be confounded with the inability of plaintiff to procure the necessary evidence for establishing, in court, a cause of action known to exist.
Holthaus v. Lane Cotton Mills Co. 3 La. App. 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Be that as it may, and taking—as we must—the allegations of the petition to be true, for purposes of both exceptions, we are of the opinion, under the ruling made in Jones vs. Texas & Pacific Railroad Company, , 51 South.
Hunter v. Laurent 104 So. 747 La. 1925
Appalachian Corp. v. Brooklyn Cooperage Co. 91 So. 539 La. 1922
South Arkansas Lumber Co. v. Tremont Lumber Co. 83 So. 378 La. 1919
Jones v. T. & P. R. R. Co., , 51 South.
Hyman v. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. 71 So. 598 La. 1916
In the case of Jones v. T. & P. R. R. Co., , 51 South.
McWilliams v. Comeaux 65 So. 112 La. 1914
Rady v. Fire Ins. Patrol of New Orleans 52 So. 491 La. 1910