Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Watson Bros. v. Jones, 51 So. 187.

24 citing documents.

Seashell, Inc. v. Simon 398 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Sullivan v. Harris Mortgage Corp. 343 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
They argue, however, , 51 So.
Kemp Furniture Co. v. Murrell 227 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Jahncke Service, Inc. v. Fertel, Inc. 220 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
654 (1940); Brown and Root, Inc. v. Gifford-Hill and Co., 319 F.2d 65 (5th Cir. 1963); , 51 So.
DePaula v. Hudson 208 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Though it is recognized that the prohibition of Article 2278 is not applicable when the party against whom judgment is sought is, in fact, a primary obligor, see generally, , 51 So.
Star Sales Company v. Arnoult 169 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
771 (La.App.Orleans 1933), , 51 So.
Walker v. Jim Austin Motor Company 162 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Custom Contract Co. v. Nims 145 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Rube v. Pacific Insurance Company of New York 131 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Hornsby v. Rives 2 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Drs. Toler Toler v. Munson 168 So. 93 La. 1936
Toler v. Munson 163 So. 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
National Materials Co. v. Guest 147 So. 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
The distinction between a , 51 So.
Williams Gray v. Stewart 147 So. 103 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1933
Collier v. Brown 141 So. 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Hartmann v. Ebeyer 138 So. 915 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
<p0 prove any promise to pay the debt of a third person.’ ” See, also, , 51 So.
Pugh v. Eylers 135 So. 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Williams v. Breazeale-Hyams Motors, Inc. 134 So. 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Lawrason v. Banister 128 So. 318 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
To prove any promise to pay the debt of a third person.” The Supreme Court, in the case of Watson Bros. vs. Jones, , 51 So.
Kleinpeter v. Connell 121 So. 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Watson Bros. vs. Jones, , 51 So.
Gast v. Loeb 8 La. App. 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Watson Bros. vs. Jones, , 51 So.
Kaufman v. Gregory 5 La. App. 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
251 , ; Guillot vs. Guillot, 141 La.
Commercial Loan Co. v. Jefferson 4 La. App. 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
The situation is very much like that acted on by the Supreme Court in Watson Bros. vs. Jones, , 51 South.
B. P. Braud, Inc. v. Beardslee 1 La. App. 623 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In the case of Watson Bros. vs. Jones, , 51 South.