Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., 187 So. 130.

21 citing documents.

Johnson v. Tayco Foods 475 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., (Orl.1939); (La.App.
Pear v. Labiche's Inc. 288 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
App. Orleans 1955); Hickingbottom v. T. G. & Y. Stores of Louisiana, Inc., Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., (La.App.
Harper v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 257 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
460 ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., Inc., La.App.1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.1940, 195 So.
Lang v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 230 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
App., ; Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App., .
Barker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 230 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
460 ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., Inc., La.App.1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.1940, 195 So.
Frederic v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 227 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
See Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., Inc., La.App., .
Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 166 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
460 ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co. Inc., La.App.1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.1940, 195 So.
Gibson v. J. C. Penney Co. 165 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
460 ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., Inc., La.App.1939, Battles v. Wellan, La.App.1940, 195 So.
Pilie v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 158 So. 2d 162 La. 1963
Gammill v. J. C. Penny Co. 156 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
460 ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., Inc., La.App.1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.1940, 195 So.
Stillwell v. Winn-Dixie Hill, Inc. 146 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, *710 La.App.1940, 195 So.
Wisckol v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. 145 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Some of the - leading and more pertinent cases oji this .prin- • ciple of law in the so-called “slip-fall” category are: Powell v. L. Feibleman Co. (1939), La.App., ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co. (1941), La.App., 200 So.
Baker v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 136 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
App. ; Bartell v. Serio, La.
Lejeune v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNTY CO. 136 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., La.App., ; Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., La.App., 72 So.
Dyer v. Stephens Buick Co. 125 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, La.App.1947, ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co., La.App.1939, .
Meyerer v. SH Kress and Co. 89 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
App.1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.
Alana v. Burnstein 86 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Powell v. [L.] Feibleman & Co., Inc., La.App., ; Bartell v. Serio, La.App., 180 So.
Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 72 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
460 ; Powell v. L. Feibleman & Co. Inc., La.App.1939, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.1940, 195 So.
Hays v. Maison Blanche Co. 30 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., ; Bartell v. Serio, La.
Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres 30 So. 2d 211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., , this court passed upon the claim of a plaintiff who was injured by reason of slipping and falling upon a banana peel located in the defendant's department store, and in that case we said: "It must be conceded that a banana peel upon the floor of a department store is potentially dangerous to the patrons of the
Walsh v. Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans 4 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
This is not a case such as was considered by us in Powell v. L. Feibleman Co., Inc., , cited by counsel, where we held that a customer could not recover from a storekeeper for injuries sustained as the result of slipping on a banana peel in the store, it appearing that the storekeeper had exercised reasonable care to keep the premises in safe condition, and there was no evidence as to how or when the