DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Haeuser v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co., 187 So. 684.

15 citing documents.

  • Cadwallader v. Allstate Ins. Co. 848 So. 2d 577 La. 2003
    & Surety Co., (Orl.App.1939); Wheat v. White, 38 F.Supp.
  • Gordon v. Southern United Fire Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    & Surety Co., (Orl.App.1939); Wheat v. White, 38 F.Supp.
  • Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Company 91 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    980 , ; Haeueser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ; Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Collins, 5 Cir., 96 F.2d 83 , certiorari denied 305 U.S. 627 , 59 S.Ct.
  • Talbot v. Allstate Insurance Company 76 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    2d 744 ; Haeuser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., Orl., 1939, ; Sun Underwriters Ins.
  • Sun Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co. 47 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    See Haeuser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., .
  • Dominguez v. American Casualty Co. 37 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , and Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Company et al., 213 La.
  • Dominguez v. American Casualty Co. 37 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , the latter case having been decided by the Orleans Court of Appeal.
  • Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co. 36 So. 2d 9 La. 1948
    However, the Court of Appeal, in my judgment, clearly distinguished this case as well as other cases cited in the opinion of that court (Haeuser v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. et al., La.App., ; Farnet v. DeCuers et al., La.App., 195 So.
  • Waits v. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America 33 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co. 29 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., , and Farnet v. DeCuers et al., La.
  • Nyman v. Monteleone-Iberville Garage 25 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , as a result of which decisions it is now established in this state that where there is such an omnibus clause, initial permission to use the car is all that is necessary and that once that initial permission is obtained, the protection of the omnibus clause attaches and is not affected by the fact that the user of t
  • Clemons v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. 18 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    191 , and Haeuser v. Ætna Casualty Surety Co. et al., La.App., .
  • Farnet v. De Cuers 196 So. 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    191 , and by the majority of the members of this court in Haeuser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, et al., .
  • Farnet v. Decuers 195 So. 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    See Haeuser v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Company et al., La.App., .
  • Perrodin v. Thibodeaux 191 So. 148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1939
    191 ; Haeuser v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. et al., La.App., .