Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 6, 1939 186 So. 365
Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company, 185 So. 716 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Grosjean v. Valloft & Dreux, Inc. 185 So. 711
Opinion text
JANVIER, Judge. The issues tendered here, except as to the amount, are identical with those involved in the matter of Alice Lee Gros-jean, Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana v. Valloft & Dreux, Inc., 185 So. 711 , decided by us this day. In this case there is no contention that there was a fire loss, though, with this single exception, every contention made there is presented here. For the reasons therein given, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from he and it is affirmed at the cost of appellant. Affirmed.