DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., 191 So. 717.

38 citing documents.

  • Paxton v. Ballard 289 So. 2d 85 La. 1974
    The basis for these decisions, however, was fully treated in Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., (1939), in which Lipscomb v. Standard Highway Co., supra, was rejected as being "...
  • Pond v. Campbell 207 So. 2d 535 La. 1968
    287 ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Landry v. Yarbrough 199 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Lee v. Peerless Insurance Company 183 So. 2d 328 La. 1966
    697 , ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Burmaster v. Texas Pacific-Missouri Pacific T. R. R., La.App., 174 So.
  • Christ v. State, Department of Highways 161 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
  • Cuccia v. Pratt Farnsworth, Inc. 155 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    161 , ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , noted 14 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Jefferson v. Jefferson 145 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    522 ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Bulova Watch Co. v. Nobles, La.App., ; Jefferson v. Tennant, La.App., .
  • Schexnaydre v. Becnel 142 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; McClenaghan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Service Fire Ins.
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 130 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Schaffer v. Lopinto, La.App., ; Delta Fire & Casualty Company v. Bird, La.App., ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; McDonald v. Stellwagon, La.App., 140 So.
  • Gilliam v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 124 So. 2d 913 La. 1960
    481 ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., and cases there cited.
  • Delta Fire & Casualty Company v. Bird 121 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Service Fire Ins. Co. of NY v. Indiana Lumber. MI Co. 111 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Lindsey v. Travelers Indemnity Company 111 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Stevens v. Guillemet, La.App., Orleans Cir., 1955, ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., Orleans Cir., 1939, ; Hecht v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.
  • O'Neill v. McAcy 83 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    In the case of Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , we held that a specific plea of contributory negligence is essential to a successful defense of a case based on a plaintiff’s contributory negligence.
  • Calvert Fire Insurance v. Lewis 83 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    The question of whether a plea of contributory negligence is necessary where a defendant in such case attempts to avoid liability on the ground that, though he may have been negligent, there was contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff, was considered and exhaustively discussed by us in Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Stevens v. Guillemet 81 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Co., La.App., ; also Hecht v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab.
  • Jones v. City of Lake Charles 80 So. 2d 411 La. 1955
    App., , and Succession of Pujol v. Manning, 221 La.
  • McClenaghan v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 79 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
    498 ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., 1939, ; French v. T. S. C. Motor Freight Lines, La.App., 1949, .
  • Sustendal v. Weber 76 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co., La.App., , in which case many authorities are cited.
  • Fruit Exchange, Inc. v. Simmons 71 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    125 ; Meyer v. Rein, La.App., ; Althans v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Oliphant v. Town of Lake Providence, La.App., 193 So.
  • Rodriguez v. Albright 70 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    we said: “It is now well established that contributory negligence is a special defense which must be pleaded in order for it to be considered, and that the defendants carry .the burden of proving the allegations relied upon by them.” In Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., , we discussed at length the effect of the failure of a defendant to alternatively plead contributory negligence.
  • Hecht v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 62 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
  • Succession of Pujol v. Manning 59 So. 2d 456 La. 1952
    In Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , at page 725, it was stated: “ * * * It is, of course, axiomatic in our jurisprudence that evidence concerning issues not raised in the pleadings, when received without objection, has the effect of enlarging the pleadings so as to include its consideration as an issue in the case.
  • Fortenberry v. Preferred Accident Ins. 48 So. 2d 657 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    In support of this argument he cites Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., , Saks v. Eichel, La.App., 167 So.
  • Lobell ex rel. Hardware Mut. Cas. Co. v. Neal 48 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    133 ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Nezat v. General Outdoor Adv.
  • Matthews v. New Orleans Terminal Co. 45 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    Aethans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Parker v. Home Indemnity Co. of New York 41 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • French v. T. S.C. Motor Freight Lines 39 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Tornabene v. Rau 34 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Golden v. Creole Delicacies 28 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Randazzo v. Meraux 27 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1946
  • Nezat v. General Outdoor Advertising Co. 24 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Meyer v. Rein 18 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    we discussed at length the effect of such a plea and showed, we think, that it is well settled that if contributory negligence is to be relied on, it is not sufficient to aver the negligence of the plaintiff to be the sole cause of the accident.
  • Distinguished Kruckeberg v. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. 13 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    See Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Hassell v. Colletti 12 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
    The case of Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , relied upon by the defendants is not in point for, there, plaintiff testified that during the period of his illness his employer actually paid him the salary for which he sought recovery.
  • Taormina Corp. v. Luckenbach Gulf S.S. Co., Inc. 6 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    666 ; Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Folse v. Flynn 200 So. 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    we said: “We experience no difficulty in determining that the allegations of the answer in this case are insufficient to raise the issue of contributory negligence.
  • Schexnaildre v. Bledsoe 194 So. 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    Our recent decision in Althans v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., , is relied on in support of the proposition.