Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kaufman Agency v. Viccellio, 174 So. 709.

13 citing documents.

Schexnayder v. Gish 948 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
371 (La.1925) (C.J. O'Neill dissenting); (La.App.
Cearley v. Farris 432 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Garrick v. Rush 275 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Corbitt v. Robinson, La.App., and Keating v. Lachney, La.App., .
Slimer v. White 275 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Gement v. Doby 246 So. 2d 253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Keating v. Lachney 216 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
E. M. Glynn, Inc. v. Duplantis 189 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
as-authority for the proposition that the absence of a broker’s license is an affirmative defense to be proved by the defendants.
Dew v. Hunter 66 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Kaufman Agency *402 v. Viccellio, et al., La.App., -711, and cases therein cited.
Corbitt v. Robinson 53 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
App., , 711: "* * * And where the agency is not exclusive, but the agent is the moving cause in securing a purchaser, and the principal, without the knowledge of the agent, sells to this prospective purchaser, at a lower price, the agent is entitled to his commission.
Donlon v. Babin 44 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
568 ; Kaufman Agency v. Viccellio, La.App., ; Zollinger v. Gust, La.App., 192 So.
Isaac v. Dronet 31 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., , is cited as authority for this contention.
Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. 23 So. 2d 193 La. 1945
1096 ; Freeman & Freeman v. Torre Realty & Improvement Co., supra; Kaufman Agency v. Viccellio et al., La.App., ; Bullis & Thomas v. Calvert, 162 La.
Sollie v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. 194 So. 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Kaufman Agency v. Viccellio, et al., La.App., -711, and cases therein cited.