DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Vaughn v. Solvay Process Co., 176 So. 241.

14 citing documents.

  • Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 99 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    First Circuit, 1937, ; Mitchell v. T. L. James & Company, Inc., La.App.
  • Mamon v. Farnsworth & Chambers Construction Co. 86 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    245 ; Vaughn v. Solvay Process Co., La.App., ; Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co., La.App., ; Lala v. American Sugar Refining Co., La.App., ; Vega v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Clifton v. Glassell-Taylor Co., La.App., ; Porter v. W. Horace Williams Co., La.App., ; McCastle v. Architectu
  • Tate v. Gullett Gin Company & Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 86 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Dupre v. Wyble 85 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
  • Phelps v. Royal Indemnity Company 77 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    See, also, Vaughn v. Solvay Process Co., La.App., , and Wilkinson v. Dubach Mill Co., Inc., 2 La.App.
  • Mouton v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 69 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    the evidence should be more convincing than it is in this case; that there should be a sound cause and good reason for the mental condition which superinduces a fear of pain in the individual strong enough to render him totally disabled.
  • Walker v. Monroe 62 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    381 ; Vaughn v. Solvay Process Co., La.App.1937, ; Buxton v. W. Horace Williams Co., La.App.1942, .
  • Peavy v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. 40 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., ; Porter v. W. Horace Williams Company, et al., La.
  • Lala v. American Sugar Refining Co. 38 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , in the opinion of which case the court said: 'While the weight of the evidence supports the conclusion that plaintiff is incapacitated from doing hard manual labor because of the physical injuries to the bones of his hand, the weight of the medical evidence also supports the conclusion that his condition is int
  • Buxton v. W. Horace Williams Co. 8 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    As we said in the case of Vaughn v. Solvay Process Company, La.App., , if the physical condition resulting to an employee from an injury is of such a nature as to cause traumatic hysteria, making him believe that he suffers pain and cannot work for fear of increasing the pain, he is still entitled to compensation.
  • Porter v. W. Horace Williams Co. 9 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    The stated rule was followed in Vaughn v. Solvay Process Company, La.App., , in the opinion of which case the court said: "While the weight of the evidence supports the conclusion that plaintiff is incapacitated from doing hard manual labor because of the physical injuries to the bones of his hand, the weight of the medical evidence also supports the conclusion that his condition is int
  • Stanford v. Long & Wolfe 199 So. 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Whilst the compensation law will permit an injured employee to recover for an injury which produced traumatic hysteria, , the evidence should be more convincing than it is in this case; that there should .be a sound cause and good reason for the mental condition which superinduces a fear of pain in the individual strong enough to render him totally disabled.
  • Anderson v. May 195 So. 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    Vaughn v. Solvay Process Co., La.App., ; Ingram v. Meridian Lbr.
  • Mitchell v. T. L. James & Co. 176 So. 245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    this day decided, we affirmed a judgment of the district court granting compensation to an employee for an injury to, his wrist which caused paralysis and inability to use his hand.