DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., 200 So. 163.

39 citing documents.

  • White v. J. Weingarten, Inc. 270 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Harper v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 257 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.
  • Jarvis v. Prout 247 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    273 ; and Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App., .” (La.App.
  • Lang v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 230 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.
  • Barker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 230 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Distinguished Bersuder v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 210 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    A case more nearly in point is Lawson v. D. H. Holmes, Co., Limited, La.App., .
  • Fish v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 205 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole *189 Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Pervel v. Hospital Service Ass'n of New Orleans 192 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    mercial buildings may be more slippery in wet weather than in dry is not of itself sufficient to constitute actionable negligence on the part of the property owner, when such a condition is observable by a reasonably prudent person of ordinary intelligence and when then the entranceway can be traversed in safety by the exercise of ordinary care * * *” See also Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Limited, (La.App.
  • Jones v. WT Grant Company 187 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
  • Tebbetts v. Marquette Casualty Co. 180 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    La.App., Orleans 1941, wherein an action was instituted by plaintiffs for damages for the death of their mother, as a •consequence of a fall she sustained while •walking out of defendant’s store on Dauphine Street, in the City of New Orleans, the court pointed out: “The accident, which occurred in broad dayligh
  • Allen v. Honeycutt 171 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Our opinion is similar to that expressed by Judge McCaleb in Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Company, La.App., (166) wherein he stated that such expert testimony was not entitled to any greater weight than that of a lay witness.
  • Burson v. Pak-A-Sak Service Stores, Inc. 169 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Smith v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 166 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Gibson v. J. C. Penney Co. 165 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App, 1940, 198 So.
  • Miller v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 164 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    ery because of water and a detergent being used in cleaning the floor, it was held that defendant was not negligent and plaintiff’s demands were rejected because “such compound (detergent) was readily visible to him,” and that “he was obviously aware of the fact the surface of the concrete in the station over which he voluntarily proceeded to walk was wet.” In Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App., , plaintiff slipped on an iron slab situated at the entranceway of the store, which slab had become
  • Burns v. Child's Properties, Inc. 156 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Orl., , the decedent slipped and fell on a step leading from the sidewalk into a vestibule in defendant’s store, the step apparently constituting a part of the vestibule.
  • Richard v. General Fire and Casualty Company 155 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Other cases which I think are peculiarly applicable and which show that plaintiffs in the instant suit are barred from recovery because of contributory negligence are Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App.Orl., , and Battles v. Wellan, La.App.
  • Lester v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. 155 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Grelle v. Patecek, La.App., , and Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App., .
  • Gammill v. J. C. Penny Co. 156 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.
  • Magoni v. Wells 154 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    See Connella v. Hartford Accident and *528 Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Grelle v. Patecek, La.App., ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Limited, La.App., ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App., 198 So.
  • Stillwell v. Winn-Dixie Hill, Inc. 146 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Cannon v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company 146 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    171 ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Company, La.App.Orl., ; Hays v. Maison Blanche Company, La.App.Orl., ; Peters v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, La.App.
  • Wisckol v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. 145 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    130 ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co. (1941), La.App., ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres (1947), La.App., ; Ellington v. Walgreen Louisiana Co., Inc. (1949), La.App., ; Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (1954), La.App., ; Meyerer v. S. H. Kress & Co. (1956), La.App., ; Lejeune v. Hartford Accident
  • Knight v. National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 142 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    See: Savoy v. G. F. Poole Mortuary, Inc., La.App.1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves vs. S. H. Kress & Co., La.
  • Baker v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 136 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    171 ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App., ; Joynes v. Valloft & Dreaux, Inc., La.App., ; Relf v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., ."
  • Lejeune v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNTY CO. 136 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    In the case of Lawson v. D. H. Holmes, La.App., , quoting from the views expressed by the Supreme Court of Ohio in S.S.
  • St. Julien v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company 127 So. 2d 245 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    1 Cir., ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App.Orleans, ; Battles v. Wellan, La.App.
  • Bradberry v. Dispenza 125 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    The vices and defects spoken of in the Articles of the Civil Code must be substantial or those which are likely to cause injury to a reasonably prudent person.” The failure to provide dry steps is not negligence per se and we find that plaintiff’s contention in this respect is answered in the negative by Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App.Orleans, 1941, , rehearing denied.
  • Connella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 119 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Meyerer v. SH Kress and Co. 89 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    2d 108 ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.1940, 198 So.
  • Alana v. Burnstein 86 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    171 ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App., ; Joynes v. Valloft & Dreaux, Inc., La.App., ; Relf v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., La.App., .” We followed this with this statement: “In the case before us there is no proof that there was any grease, soap, water or other foreign substance on the floor at the spot where plaintiff fell.
  • Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 72 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    1952, ; Boucher v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., La.App.1947, ; Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App.1941, ; Greeves v. S. H. Kress & Co., La.App.
  • Denneker v. Pecoraro 64 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In Lawson v. D. H. Holmes Co., La.App., , we were confronted with a situation which, to some extent, resembled that which is presented here.
  • Kieffer v. Larry & Katz 46 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    “Defendant cites the case of Lawson et al. v. D. H. Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App., *516 1941, , where the court stated that Mrs. Lawson knew it was raining and that she is to be charged with knowledge of the fact that one is apt to slip on a wet surface, the defect being an apparent one; that there must be fault on the part of the store-keeper and ignorance of danger on the part of the customer.
  • Hays v. Maison Blanche Co. 30 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; Joynes v. Valloft Dreaux, Inc., La.
  • McQuillan v. City of New Orleans 18 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    Holmes Company, Ltd., La.App., ; Cassanova v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc., et al., La.App., ; Cassanova v. Paramount-Richards Theatres, Inc. et al., 204 La.
  • Walsh v. Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans 4 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App., ; 45 Corpus Juris, verbo "Negligence", Section 811.
  • De Latour v. Roosevelt Hotel 1 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Holmes Co., Ltd., La.App., .
  • Relf v. &198tna Casualty Surety Co. 1 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    Holmes Company, Ltd., La.App., ; Bartell v. Serio, La.App., 180 So.