Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Quina v. Robert's, 16 So. 2d 558.

15 citing documents.

Jimmie Hairford and Wayne Hairford v. Centurytel, Inc. & Centurytel of Central Louisiana, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
[Orl.1944], Pack v. Wise, La.App.
Hairford v. Centurytel, Inc. 856 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
[Orl.1944], ; Pack v. Wise, La.App., .
Cadle Co. v. Hobbs 673 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
App. [Orl.1944], ; Pack v. Wise, La.App., .
St. Julien v. South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. 433 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(OrlLaApp, 1944); Graham v Western Union Tel.
Parish Nat. Bank v. Lane 397 So. 2d 1282 La. 1981
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Diffey 378 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Lucas v. Ludwig 313 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
265 (1919); See The Right of Privacy in Louisiana, 28 La.L.Rev.
Love v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co. 263 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(Orl.La.App., 1944); Graham v. Western Union Tel.
Booty v. American Finance Corp. of Shreveport 224 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
265 ; Quina v. Roberts et al., La.App., (Orleans, 1944); Pack v. Wise, La.App., (3d Cir., 1963).
Everett v. Community Credit Co. of Scenic 224 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
265 ; Quina v. Roberts, La.App., ; Pack v. Wise, La.App., .” In that case, the Court recognized that a creditor may indulge in reasonable means to collect his accounts and that repeated requests for payment do not per se constitute harassment; nevertheless, the defendant in that case clearly exceeded the bounds of reason.
Passman v. Commercial Credit Plan of Hammond, Inc. 220 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Thus, assuming that the simple action of contacting a debtor's employer is not actionable in Louisiana as coercive in itself (but see Quina v. Roberts, La.App., ) it might well be argued that the defendant Wise's actions in writing the initial letter and in following it up with an explanatory telephone call in response to the bank's reply to his initial letter did not by themselves constitute conduct on his part unreasonably violating the plaintiff's right to privacy.
Boudreaux v. Allstate Finance Corporation 217 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
265 ; Quina v. Roberts, La.App., ; Pack v. Wise, La.App., .
Pack v. Wise 155 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
265 ; Quina v. Roberts, La.App.Orl., .
Ford v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 139 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
(Orleans Appeal 1944); Laird v. Natchitoches Oil Mill, 10 La.App.
Holland v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 135 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Reliance by plaintiffs is also placed on Quina v. Roberts (1944) La.App., , in which damages were allotted because of humiliation attendant upon defendant's writing plaintiff's employer a letter informing the employer of an indebtedness owed defendant by plaintiff and soliciting the employer's assistance and cooperation in its collection.