DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, 2 So. 2d 668.

27 citing documents.

  • Gautreaux v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 694 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Spanja v. Thibodeaux [Thibodaux] Boiler Works
  • McKee v. Inspectorate America Corp. 636 So. 2d 305 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
  • Adams v. Time Saver Stores, Inc. 615 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • Weber v. State 608 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 580 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Spanja vs. Thibodeaux [Thibodaux] Boiler Works [La.App], .
  • Devane v. Board of Commissioners 420 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    The liberal construction of the Workmen’s Compensation Act required to accomplish its humane purpose by including all workmen reasonably afforded its protection must equally be applied when an injured person seeks exclusion from the act in order to seek damages in tort
  • Dupre v. Sterling Plate Glass & Paint Co., Inc. 344 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    To support their contention to the contrary, (La.
  • McBeth v. Salvation Army 314 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    453 , ; Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., .
  • Fabre v. Travelers Insurance Company 286 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Spanja vs. Thibodeaux [Thibodaux] Boiler Works [La.App.], .
  • Canter v. Koehring Company 283 So. 2d 716 La. 1973
  • Schmolke v. Krauss Company 217 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    The liberal construction of the Workmen's Compensation Act required to accomplish its humane purpose by including all workmen reasonably afforded its protection must equally be applied when an injured person seeks exclusion from the act in order to seek damages in tort
  • Beard v. Wilson Wholesale Distributors, Inc. 215 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    453 , , the Courts said: "We find the following statement found in the case of Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., , (2), to be very appropriate and applicable to these three cases: `The compensation statute, with its amendments, was designated to cover all employees who might reasonably be brought under its paternalistic protection.
  • Pflieger v. Haws 180 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    23:1032; Spanja vs. Thibodaux Boiler Works, (Ct.App.La., Orl., 1941); Dixon vs. Herrin Transportation Co., (Ct.App.La., 2d Cir., 1955); Humphreys vs. Marquette Casualty Co., 235 La.
  • Hatten v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. 112 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, Inc., La.App., ; Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co., La.App., 40 So.
  • Stafford v. Gilmer 98 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    The first of these is Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, Inc., La.App.1941, , decided by the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans.
  • Stansbury v. Magnolia Petroleum Company 91 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Our decision in the Thibodaux case further stated as follows: "We find the following statement found in the case of Spanja v. *920 Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., (2), to be very appropriate and applicabe to these three cases: "The compensation statute, with its amendments, was designed to cover all employees who might reasonably be brought under its paternalistic protection.
  • Travelers Fire Ins. v. Savoy 82 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    81 ; Spanja v. Thibodeaux Boiler Works, Inc., La.App., and Robinson v. Atkinson, 198 La.
  • Dixon v. Herrin Transportation Co. 81 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    ground of attack, the trial court reached the conclusion that at the time of the accident plaintiff had “consented to work for defendant and was injured in the course of that employment.” Authority for this holding is Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., , and it is upon this same authority that counsel for defendant principally relies before this pourt.
  • Shumake v. Home Indemnity Co. 68 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    887 ; Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, La.App., ; Atchinson v. May, 201 La.
  • Speed v. Page 59 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    And, certainly, the facts do not warrant the application of the “employee pro hac vice” principle considered in the case of Spanja v. Thibodeaux Boiler Works, La.App., , which is heavily relied upon by counsel for defendant, Page.
  • Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co. 53 So. 2d 137 La. 1951
    One of the principal Court of Appeal cases relied upon by respondents is Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works, Inc., et al., , decided by the Court of Appeal for the Parish of Orleans.
  • Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co. 45 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    81 ; Hutto v. Arbour, La.App., ; Cali v. Cloverland, La.App., ; Spanja v. Thibodeaux Boiler Works, La.App., ; Duke v. Dixie Bldg.
  • Thibodaux v. Sun Oil Co. 40 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., , 672, (2), to be very appropriate and applicable to these three cases: "The compensation statute, with its amendments, was designed to cover all employees who might reasonably be brought under its paternalistic protection.
  • Dixie MacHine, Weld. Mtl. Wks. v. Boulet Transp. 38 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    App., and in Duke v. Dixie Building Material Co., La.
  • Vidrine v. Soileau 38 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., ; Dandridge v. Fidelity Casualty Co., La.
  • Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works 33 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Duke v. Dixie Bldg. Material Co. 23 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945