Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Weddle v. Phelan, 177 So. 407.

13 citing documents.

Michel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 314 So. 2d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Moak v. Link-Belt Company 229 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
both defendants were held liable on failure to exculpate themselves.
Nelson v. Zurich Insurance 165 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
189 ; Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., .” The Gore case was an action by plaintiff as a subrogated insurer for the recovery of the amount paid its insured, the owner of a building which had been damaged as the result of an intersectional automobile collision.
Stalsby v. Powell 146 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1 Cir., and Benson v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York, La.App.
Derouen v. American Employers Insurance 118 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
189 ; Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., .’ “That statement seems to be a mis-statement of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.
Upshaw v. Great American Indemnity Company 112 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Cited in support of this postulation are the cases of Weddle v. Phelan, La.App.1937, and Benson v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York, La.App.1955, .
Insurance Co. of North America v. Gore 106 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
189 ; Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., .
Harris v. Varnado 94 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
This court in the case of Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., , held that where plaintiff made general allegations of negligence against the defendants as well as specific allegations of negligence based on information and belief, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies, citing 9 Blashfield's Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, pp. 244, 245, § 5983; Horrell v. Gulf &amp
Benson v. Metropolitan Cas. Ins. Co. of New York 79 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
See Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., -410 .
Jones v. Farris 77 So. 2d 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Under the doctrine of Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., , Woodrow Jones could have recovered against both Charlie Jones and Farris in solido.
Guiteau v. Southern Parking Co. 49 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
The same result was reached by the same Court in Weddle v. Phelan, La.App., .
Bonner v. Boudreaux 8 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
psa loquitur, and he now contends that, as each defendant places the blame for the collision on the other, the result is that neither has given a satisfactory explanation for the collision — the evidence of one neutralizing that of the other — thus leaving both of them to bear the blame under the above doctrine, , where we said: "The plaintiff in alleging and proving the happening of the accident under circumstances indicating that the accident would not have happened but for the neg
Leggett v. Alexandria Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 199 So. 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
this court made an award of $1,000 to a young man twenty-two years of age who was engaged as a professional baseball player for an eye injury which had produced a definite loss of vision of from ten to fifteen per cent, and left him with a disfigurement which, it was found, would undoubtedly cause him some emba