Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., 7 So. 2d 420.

25 citing documents.

Williams v. Griffin 422 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Ordonez v. Toys Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 160 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; 203 La.
Duane v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company 148 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
In Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , the court said: "It is well established that a carrier of passengers is not an insurer, but it is required to exercise the highest degree of care, vigilance and precaution for the safety of those it undertakes to transport and is liable for the slightest negligence.
Shannon v. Shreveport Transit Co. 149 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
272, 273 ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App.1942, , affirmed 203 La.
Cox v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 144 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
To the same effect are the holdings in the cases of Hopper v. Shreveport Railway Company, La.App., , and Oppenheim v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company, La.App., .
Dixon v. Jenkins 139 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
376 ; Roy v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., ; Ensminger v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Hughes v. Baton Rouge Electric Co., La.App., 188 So.
Le Beau v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 136 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
"In the case of Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , this court was of the opinion that: "`It is well established that there is no liability in a public carrier where the accident results from an emergency created entirely by causes for which the carrier is not responsible.
Johnson v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 113 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
473 ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; ; Hopper v. Shreveport Rys.
Coleman v. Continental Southern Lines 107 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
473 ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App.1942, ; Grant v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, Inc., La.App.1943, ; Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines, La.App.1945, ; Jakubec v. Southern Bus Lines, La.App.1947, ; Hopper v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App.
Deason v. Greyhound Corporation 106 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
1206 ; Valdry v. Baton Rouge Bus Co., La.App., ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , affirmed 203 La.
Coleman v. Shreveport Railways Company 86 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
App., ; Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines, La.App., ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Hughes v. Baton Rouge Electric Co., La.App., 188 So.
Rauscholb v. Continental Southern Lines, Inc. 81 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Hamburger v. Katz, 10 La.App., 215 , 120 So.
Pero v. Shreveport Railways Co. 78 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
379 ; Anderson v. City of Monroe, La.App.1941, ; Valdry v. Baton Rouge Bus Company, Inc., La.App.1941, ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Company, La.App.1942, , affirmed, 1943, 203 La.
Roy v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 76 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1954
354 , , the Supreme Court quoted with approval the following language which appeared in a decision of this Court in Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., : “ ‘It is also well established in our jurisprudence that, where a passenger is injured in an accident and has failed to reach his destination in safety, the burden is on the carrier to prove itself free from fault, but it is not required to show how and why the passenger was injured in order to bar recovery.
Baker v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 68 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
379 ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App.1942, , affirmed 203 La.
Young v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 68 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
* ’ ” We said in Wayne v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., , 57: “It is well settled under our jurisprudence that the ‘emergency doctrine’ applies to public carriers of passengers for hire and will serve to exculpate them from situations where emergencies have arisen through no fault of theirs and accidents ensue.” See, also, Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , in which we said: “It is well established that there is no liability in a public carrier where the accident res
Bishop v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 63 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
App., ; Jones v. Baton Rouge Electric Co., La.App., 192 So.
Reeves v. Texas Mut. Ins. 62 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
1067 , ; Id., La.App., ; Buswell v. Missouri Pac.
Wayne v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 52 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
In the case of Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , this court was of the opinion that:.
Hopper v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 51 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
473 ; Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., ; Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines, La.App., .
Jakubec v. Southern Bus Lines 31 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
App., ; Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines, La.
Murphy v. Henderson 23 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
App. , 421, as follows: "It is well established that a carrier of passengers is not an insurer, but it is required to exercise the highest degree of care, vigilance and precaution for the safety of those it undertakes to transport and is liable for the slightest negligence.
Brown v. Homer-Doyline Bus Lines 23 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
Gross v. Teche Lines, Inc. 21 So. 2d 378 La. 1945
They are correctly stated in the case of Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., , as follows: “It is well established that a carrier of passengers is not an insurer, but it is required to exercise the highest degree of *359 care, vigilance and precaution for the safety of those it undertakes to transport and is liable for the slightest negligence.
Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 14 So. 2d 854 La. 1943