Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, 5 So. 2d 20.

16 citing documents.

Menard v. Associated Royal Crown Bottling Co. 249 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
185 (La.App.1940); (La.App.
Succession of Guidry v. Bank of Terrebonne & Trust Co. 193 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Kinard v. City of Jennings 184 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Highway Commission, La.App., , where an allegation, that a defect in the highway could not be seen by the motorist, was held not inconsistent with an allegation that the defect had existed so long the state should have known of it.
West v. Carbone 126 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
801 ; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App.Orleans, 1941, ; and Simoneaux v. Gonzales, La.App.
Bruton v. Traders & General Insurance 111 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
831 ; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., ; O’Hanlon v. Phoenix Building & Homestead Ass’n, 17 La.App.
Simoneaux v. State, Department of Highways 106 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
405 , ; King v. Risdon & W. E. Holoman Lumber Company, Inc., La.App., ; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
Mershon v. Cutrer 85 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Hogg v. Department of Highways of the State 80 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App.1941, .
Finance Security Co. v. Stuart 75 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
This whole question was fully discussed in Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
Reynolds Metal Co. v. TL James & Co. 69 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Reeves v. Globe Indemnity Company of New York, supra; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., .
Gill v. Citizen 63 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
1068 , ; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., 1941, .
Turner v. Maryland Casualty Co. 44 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1950
801 ; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., Orleans, and Simoneaux v. Gonzales, La.App., First Circuit, .” *377 Therefore, plaintiff should have been granted the relief prayed for in his original and supplemental motion for rehearing.
Pannagl v. Stouder 34 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
App., ; Schneckenberger v. John Bonura Co., Inc., 14 La.
Reagor v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. 33 So. 2d 521 La. 1948
801 ; Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission, La.App., Orleans, and Simoneaux v. Gonzales, La.App., First Circuit, .
Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission 15 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Overruled Arceneaux v. Louisiana Highway Commission 12 So. 2d 733 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1943
This exception was overruled by us. .