DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Waguespack v. Savarese, 13 So. 2d 726.

17 citing documents.

  • Rills v. Southern Bell Telephone Company 289 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • LaScola v. Mexic 222 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    See Dooner v. Parish Cab Company, La.App., (1962); Paretti v. Suarez, La.App., (1946) ; Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., (1943).
  • Bates v. Lagars 193 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
  • Mathews v. Employers Mutual Fire Insurance 180 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Amant (La.App.Orlcans, 1952, writs denied), ; Waguespack v. Savarese (La.App.Orl., 1943), .
  • Frazier v. Calhoun 165 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Orleans, 1943, ; Riggs v. F. Strauss & Son et al., La.App.
  • Gaspard v. LeMaire 158 So. 2d 149 La. 1963
    [4] Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., ; Smith v. Howard Crumley & Co. Inc., La.App., 171 So.
  • Gaspard v. Lemaire 146 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    for the mutual benefit of himself and the driver, then, as to third persons involved in the accident, the negligence of the driver is imputed to the owner as that of an agent, and if a proximate cause of the accident, may either render the owner liable to the third party or constitute contributory negligence barring recovery by the owner from the third party, see Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.App., ; Riggs v. F. Strauss & Son, La.App., , see also Note, 12 La.Law
  • Service Fire Insurance Company v. Johnson 138 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    for the mutual benefit of himself and the driver, then, as to third persons involved in the accident, the negligence of the driver is imputed to the owner as that of an agent, and if a proximate cause of the accident, may either render the owner liable to the third party or constitute contributory negligence barring recovery by the owner from the third party, see Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.App., ; Riggs v. F. Strauss & Son, La.App., , see also Note, 12 La.Law
  • Mayberry v. McDuffie 135 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App.Orleans, 1943, .
  • Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Insurance Co. 88 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    t or for the mutual benefit of himself and the driver; then, as to third persons involved in the accident, the negligence of the driver is imputed to the owner as that of an agent, and if a proximate cause of the accident, may either render the owner liable to the third party or constitute contributory negligence barring recovery by the owner from the third party, Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., ; Weitkam v. Johnson, La.
  • Gaines v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 86 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    But, for certain, historical reasons, it is settled that as to third persons involved in an accident, the negligence of the driver is imputed to the owner of the car when he is- riding therein as that of an agent, and if a proximate cause of -the accident, will constitute contributory negligence barring recovery by the owner from the third party, Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.App., ; Riggs v. F. Strauss & Son, La.App., ; see also Note, 12 La.
  • Stockwell v. Gulf Engineering Co. 83 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    In Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., , this court had occasion to say: “If Mr. Waguespack’s story is correct, when he was somewhere between 150 and 300 feet from the other car he saw it swerve to his side and back at least twice.
  • Taormina v. Reid 71 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    32:232 it is provided that: • “Drivers of vehicles proceeding in opposite directions shall pass each other to the right, each giving the other for at least two hundred feet before meeting, one half of the main travelled portion of the highway.” In Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., , we quoted from Mr. Blash-field’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Vol.
  • Hubble v. Bourg 68 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., , the question of "joint adventure" is discussed, and the language of the Supreme Court in Lawrason v. Richard, supra, is quoted as follows: "There is no joint adventure, in the sense that the occupant of an automobile is equally liable with the driver unless there be also equal right to control the operation of
  • Porter v. De Boisblanc 64 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., ; Galiano v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, La.App., .
  • Galiano v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation 55 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1951
    That fact was recognized by us in Waguespack v. Savarese, La.App., .
  • Buquet v. St. Amant 55 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    wherein was cited several authorities, we held that where the owner of an automobile embarks on a joint pleasure ride with another, whom he permits to drive the car, the owner having an equal right to control, each is to be held liable for the negligent operation of the automobile, on the doctrine of joint adventure