Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State Ex Rel. Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, 178 So. 176.
- Ken Lawler Builders, Inc. v. Delaney 837 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
-
McCoy v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board
308 So. 2d 382
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, La.App., ; State ex rel.
-
St. John the Baptist School Board v. Marbury-Pattillio Construction Co.
236 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, La.App., .
-
Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Charpentier
165 So. 2d 614
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, La.App., 181 .
-
Bonnabel v. Police Jury
44 So. 2d 872
La. 1950
Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, La.App., ; followed in State ex rel.
-
Gasoline Plant Const. Corp. v. Blair
38 So. 2d 662
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
App., ; Board of Com'rs.
-
State Ex Rel. Kennington v. Red River Parish School Board
185 So. 490
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, La.App., , that ‘teachers shall serve a probationary term of 3 years, during which probationary term the school board can dismiss or discharge any probationary teacher upon the recommendation of the superintendent, who shall assign reasons therefor.
-
State Ex Rel. Chaney v. Vernon Parish School Board
179 So. 320
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, La.App., , that “teachers shall serve a probationary term of 3 years; during *322 which probationary term the school board can dismiss or discharge any probationary teacher upon the recommendation of the superintendent, who shall assign reasons therefor.
-
Overruled
State Ex Rel. Haight v. Vernon Parish School Board
178 So. 181
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Austin L. Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, Intervention of Miss Pearle Peace, La.App., , this day decided, the motion to dismiss or remand the case is overruled; and it is ordered that the judgment dismissing the intervention of Miss Pearle Peace is affirmed at her costs; and that the judgment in favor of relator and against the defendant school board is affirmed at the cost of defendant.
-
Overruled
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Vernon Parish School Board
178 So. 181
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Austin L. Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, Intervention of Miss Pearle Peace, La.App., , this day decided, the motion to dismiss or remand the case is overruled; and it is ordered that the judgment dismissing the intervention of Miss Pearle Peace is affirmed at her costs; and that the judgment in favor of relator and against the defendant school board is affirmed at the cost of defendant.
-
Overruled
State Ex Rel. Merchant v. Vernon Parish School Board
178 So. 180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Austin L. Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, Intervention of Miss Pearle Peace, La.App., , this day decided, the motion to dismiss or remand the case is overruled; and it is ordered.that the judgment dismissing the intervention of Miss Pearle Peace is affirmed at her costs; and that the judgment in favor of relator and against the defendant school board is affirmed at the cost of defendant.
-
Overruled
State Ex Rel. Winfree v. Vernon Parish School Board
178 So. 180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Austin L. Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, Intervention of Miss Pearle Peace, La.App., , this day decided, the motion to dismiss or remand the case is overruled;, and it is ordered that the judgment dismissing the intervention of Miss Pearle Peace is affirmed at her costs; and that the judgment in favor of relator and against the defendant school board is affirmed at the cost of defendant.
-
Overruled
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Vernon Parish School Board
178 So. 180
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Austin L. Temple v. Vernon Parish School Board, Intervention of Miss Pearle Peace, La.App., , this day decided, the motion to dismiss or remand the case is overruled; and it is ordered that the judgment dismissing the intervention of Miss Pearle Peace is affirmed at her costs; and that the judgment in favor of relator and against the defendant school board is affirmed at the cost of defendant.