Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ross v. Tynes, 14 So. 2d 80.

13 citing documents.

  • Stewart v. Wilkerson 773 So. 2d 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Ross v. Tynes, La.App.1943, .
  • Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 454 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Ross v. Tynes, et al., (Orl.La.App.
  • Walker v. Travelers Indemnity Company 289 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Ross v. Tynes, et al., (Orl.App.
  • Theriot v. Transit Casualty Company 265 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    App., ; writ refused Nov.
  • Guerra v. WJ Young Construction Company 165 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    The trial judge charged the jury on res ipsa loquitur, and this characterization of cases of wheels becoming detached is correct; (La.
  • Steadman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Company 113 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    Ross v. Tynes, La.App., ; Ortego et al. v. Nehi Bottling Works et al., 199 La.
  • Stell v. Briggs 69 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    Cited, among many others, is the case of Ross v. Tynes, La.App., , from which we quote: “In other words, when an injury is caused by an instrumentality under the exclusive control of the defendant, as in this case, and it is such as would' not ordinarily happen if the party having cpntrol of the instrumentality had used proper care, there arises an inference or presumption -of
  • Marks v. Highway Ins. Underwriters 51 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    Counsel for defendants has cited the case of Ross v. Tynes et al, La.App., , as authority for the proposition that a defendant whose vehicle gets out of control or causes injury because of mechanical defect not discoverable by ordinary inspection is not liable for the resulting injuries.
  • Landry v. News-Star-World Pub. Corp. 46 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    Lockwood v. Kennedy, La.App., ; Ross v. Tynes et al., La.App., ; Gerald v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, Inc., 204 La.
  • Lejeune v. Collard 44 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    which is an Orleans Court of Appeal case, the surviving widow brought suit for the death of her husband, who was killed while working on a sidewalk, when a double wheel of a passing truck came off and struck him.
  • Anderson v. London Guarantee Accident Co. 36 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , 81, decided by the Orleans Court of Appeal, in which writs were refused by the Supreme Court, somewhat approaches the facts involved in the instant case.
  • Schon v. James 28 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    and Rochefort v. Teche Lines, Inc. et al., 186 So.
  • Watkins v. Gulf Refining Co. 20 So. 2d 273 La. 1944
    Ross v. Tynes, La.App., ; Ortego et al. v. Nehi Bottling Works et al., 199 La.