Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leonard v. Garrett, 54 So. 984.

18 citing documents.

Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Woods v. Stoma 242 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Manson Realty Company v. Plaisance 196 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Littleton 125 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
International Paper Co. v. Masters 103 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
See Leonard v. Garrett, 1911, , 54 So.
Texas Company v. O'MEARA 82 So. 2d 769 La. 1955
Civil Code, Articles 3437 and 3498; , 54 So.
Gaylord Container Corp. v. Stilley 79 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Rhodes v. Collier 41 So. 2d 669 La. 1949
All of these essentials are present in the case at bar as plaintiffs have proven actual possession 1 of a part of the tract, which extended civilly to all the land included within the boundaries as stated in the title deed of Mrs. Rhodes, Articles 3437 and 3498 of the Civil Code; , 54 So.
Finley v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. 16 So. 2d 839 La. 1944
Smith v. Southern Kraft Corporation 13 So. 2d 335 La. 1943
Civil Code, Articles 3437 and 3498; , 54 So.
Rives v. Starcke 196 So. 657 La. 1940
Soule v. West 170 So. 26 La. 1936
Tremont Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co. 139 So. 12 La. 1931
Plumb v. Hammond Lands, Inc. 134 So. 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Capra v. Viola 135 So. 41 La. 1931
'535, , the court, referring to' the cases of Waddill v. Walton and Lambert v. Craig, supra, said: “Those were eases where the party invoking prescription had never had possession.
Haas v. Currie 126 So. 547 La. 1930
State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co. 113 So. 833 La. 1927
Miller v. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. 63 So. 883 La. 1913