DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., 57 So. 309.

22 citing documents.

  • Fortmayer v. Schulingkamp 405 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    “In Templeman Bros. Lumber Co., Inc., v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Moreno's, Inc. v. LAKE CHARLES CATHOLIC HIGH SCHS., INC. 315 So. 2d 660 La. 1975
    In Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Cub Beverage Co. v. Transportation Equipment Co. 223 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    733 , ; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Minot Hooper Co. v. Crowley Industrial Bag Co. 217 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    906 , 40 L.R.A.,N.S., 480, and cases cited therein; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co., Inc. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Abraham v. Dalworth Machinery Co. 167 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Sikes v. B & S Supply, Inc. 164 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    733 , ; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Daly v. Abramson 117 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Temple-Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Johnson v. Hunter 88 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    In Templeman Bros. Lumber Co., Inc., v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., -1001 , 57 So.
  • Welsh v. Hume 86 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    570 ; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Mohana v. Woodall 69 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    906 , 40 L.R.A., N.S., 480; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Sterbcow v. Peres 64 So. 2d 195 La. 1953
    Templeman Brothers Lumber Co., Inc., v. Fairbanks Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Tuminello v. Mawby 57 So. 2d 666 La. 1952
    In Templeman Bros. Lumber Co., Inc., v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Tuminello v. Mawby 57 So. 2d 666 La. 1952
    *740 In Templeman Bros. Lumber Co., Inc., v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Sidney MacH. Tool Co. v. Blanchard 172 So. 532 La. 1937
    Code, art. 2541 et seq.; Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Standard Motor Car Co. v. St. Amant 138 So. 461 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    Amant’s word for it, when he says that he did have some trouble with the car, but, to use the language of the Supreme Court in the case of Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 67 So.
  • Standard Motor Co. v. St. Amant 134 So. 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    Plaintiff relies confidently on the case of Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 So.
  • Colt Co. v. Seal 4 La. App. 618 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    351 ; and Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. vs. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 South.
  • Borden Aicklen Auto Supply Co. v. Mid City, Inc. 4 La. App. 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
  • Thomson Machinery Co. v. Haley 1 La. App. 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    rt has recently held: “When a purchaser of machinery has used it for more than a year before offering to return it to the seller, and has paid several of the notes furnished by him for the purchase price, with full knowledge of the defects of the machinery, he must be held to have accepted the machinery, and is, therefore, bound to pay for it.” The same ruling was made in Templeman vs. Fairbanks, , 57 South.
  • Champion Shoe Machine Co. v. Culmone 1 La. App. 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    In the case of Templeman vs. Fairbanks, , the court said on p. 1004: “It is an undisputed fact that the plaintiff used the machinery for more than a year before offering to return it to the defendant.
  • American Paint Works v. Metairie Ridge Nursery Co. 1 La. App. 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Templeman Bros. Lumber Co. vs. Fairbanks, Morse and Co., , 57 South.
  • Louisiana Box Co. v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 1 La. App. 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
    Defendant confidently relies upon the case of Templeton Bros. vs. Fairbanks, Morse & Co., , 57 South.