Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Tuegeau, 58 So. 497.
-
Virgie Mae Bertrand Trahan, Individually and as Administratrix of the Succession of Olivia Bellard Bertrand v. Alfred Louis …
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The treatise states that “[f]orced heirs have been permitted to challenge such donations after the donor’s death, yet only to the extent of their 4 legitimes.” Frederick William Swaim, Jr., and Kathryn Venturatos Lorio, 10 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Succession and Donations, § 11.11, p. 290 (1995) ( So.
-
Trahan v. Bertrand
952 So. 2d 809
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Frederick William Swaim, Jr., and Kathryn Venturatos Lorio, 10 Louisiana Civil Law Treatise, Succession and Donations, § 11.11, p. 290 (1995) ( , 58 So.
- Succession of Miller 405 So. 2d 812 La. 1981
-
Wilson v. Norflis
382 So. 2d 1059
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
65Ó, (1912), where the court said that the right to attack a donation omnium bonorum after the death of the donor can only be exercised by forced heirs.
-
Owen v. Owen
325 So. 2d 283
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
NOTES [1] Compare statements in (1) , 58 So.
- Mier v. Troxler 235 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Menard v. Muhs 196 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
- Succession of Browne 176 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
- Fried v. Bradley 52 So. 2d 247 La. 1951
- Luening v. Natal 11 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
-
Broussard v. Hotard
4 So. 2d 563
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
648 , ; Eichorn v. New Orleans C.R.
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese 196 So. 558 La. 1940
- Boutwell v. Gunter 185 So. 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
- Ekman v. Vallery 169 So. 521 La. 1936
- Ducote v. Ducote 165 So. 133 La. 1935
-
State Ex Rel. Palfrey v. Sims
150 So. 428
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Its use is confined to offices in public corporations such as mayor of a city,” etc. The rule that appellate courts will not consider issues which have not been raised in the pleadings or considered byl the trial court, , 58 So.
-
Bacon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
137 So. 213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
648 , ; Marston et al. v. Shreveport Traction Co., 140 La.
-
Robichaux v. Dorion
134 So. 784
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
648 , ; Mequet v. Algiers, 147 La.
- Weinfield v. Yellow Cab Co. 120 So. 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
- Chopin v. City of New Orleans 8 La. App. 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
-
Northwestern Bottle Co. v. Rosen
8 La. App. 284
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
65 , ; Bonnin vs. Town of Crowley, 112 La.
- Succession of Leroy 103 So. 328 La. 1925
-
State v. American Ry. Express Co.
106 So. 544
La. 1924
Pleas and issues not raised in the lower court cannot be raised on appeal ( , 58 So.
-
Matulevitch v. American Railway Express Co.
6 Pelt. 106
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1923
We have examined the cases cited by counsel for appellant, O'Neill vs. Leinicke, 49 A. 3 ; Crawford vs. Puckett, 14 A. 649 ; ; and waxiind in our opinion these authorities differentiate, and a careful reading will show that they in no wise conflict with the authorities we have cited in this esse.