Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Heirs v. Martinez, 51 So. 679.

37 citing documents.

Quantum Resources Management, L.L.C. v. Pirate Lake Oil Corp. 112 So. 3d 209 La. 2013
1033, 1041 , (1944) (“[F]or the purpose of prescription under the Constitution, it is immaterial whether the assessment was made in the name of the true owner, or in the name of another, or in no name at all.”); Weber’s , 51 So.
Gulf States Corp. v. Barberate 486 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
In Weber’s Heirs v. Martinez, [ , 51 So.
Hubbs v. Canova 392 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
In Weber's Heirs v. Martinez, [ , 51 So.
Garrett v. Ernest 369 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Verret v. Norwood 311 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Gulotta v. Cutshaw 283 So. 2d 482 La. 1973
Succession of Leopold Welsch v. Carmadelle 264 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1972
322 , ]; Weber’s , 51 So.
Choate v. O'BRIEN 163 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Butler, supra; , 51 So.
Van Norden v. Martin 149 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Ewald v. Hodges 120 So. 2d 465 La. 1960
662 [663], , the Court said: “ ‘ to the plaintiffs’ allegation that no taxes were due, the answer is that it being admitted that none were paid, and it not being pretended that the property was exempt, the taxes were necessarily due, provided there was an assessment, and the tax debtor is barred by the constitutional prescriptio
Cobbs v. Jackson 85 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
386 , 387; Weber’s , 51 So.
Kathman-Landry, Inc. v. Morrison 64 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
[663] 666, 667, ; Canter v. Williams, 107 La.
Quatre Parish Co. v. Beauregard Parish School Board 57 So. 2d 197 La. 1952
Jackson v. Irion 200 So. 18 La. 1941
Morris v. Hankins 188 So. 155 La. 1939
In the case of Weber’s , 51 So.
Morris v. Hankins 185 So. 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
This is made perfectly clear by the following expression of our Supreme Court in the case of Weber’s , 51 So.
Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
Gayle v. Slicer 178 So. 498 La. 1938
Goertz v. Menard 168 So. 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
mentioning, as it does, only the township, would not have identified the land, and the tax sale would therefore have been null, if the tax debtors had had any other land in that township; but this 960-acre tract was all they had, hence this description, imperfect as it was, identified their land, since it applied to it* and to none other, and was therefore, sufficient.” Weber’s , 51 So; 679; Landry *752 et al. v. McWilliams, 135 La.
Brown v. Tauzin 163 So. 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
290 , and cases there referred to.” In Weber’s , 51 So.
Schultz v. Kellar 136 So. 220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Hargrove v. Hodge 121 So. 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
In the ease of Weber’s Heirs vs. Martinez, , 51 So.
Dupuis v. Reynaud 8 La. App. 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1928
(Weber’s Heirs vs. Martinez, , 51 So.
Blanchard v. Estate of Hy Garland 6 La. App. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Weber’s Heirs vs. Martinez, , 51 South.
Fellman's Heirs v. Interstate Land Co. 112 So. 405 La. 1927
Hovarth v. Eppling 6 La. App. 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In Weber vs. Martinez, , 51 South.
Marque v. Kolwe 5 La. App. 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
“Where A, the tax debtor, owns certain lots in a particular square, the municipal number and street boundaries of which are given, the property is sufficiently described for the purposes of its assessment and rale for taxes as ‘certain lots (in the square designated) assessed to A, such de *544 scription including all the lots owned by A in the square described.” Webers’ Heirs vs. Martinez, ; 112 La.
Gamet's Estate v. Lindner 106 So. 22 La. 1925
Muller v. Mazerat, cited supra; Weber’s , 51 So.
Pierson v. Castell Land & Harbor Co. 105 So. 274 La. 1925
Nebraska-Tensas Co. v. Moritz 102 So. 195 La. 1924
Manade v. Brown 84 So. 170 La. 1920
992 ; Weber’s , 51 South.
Board of Com'rs v. Concordia Land & Timber Co. 74 So. 921 La. 1916
See Martinez Case, , 51 South.
Schwartzenberg v. Schwartzenberg 70 So. 230 La. 1915
285 ; Weber’s , 51 South.
Amrhein v. Nylka Land Co. 68 So. 957 La. 1915
[2] In support of the plea of prescription, the defendant’s counsel cite the decision of this court in Weber’s , 51 South.
Abshire v. Lege 62 So. 667 La. 1913
Vannetta v. Busbey 60 So. 76 La. 1912
In re Perrault's Estate 54 So. 939 La. 1911