Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Burvant v. Wolfe, 52 So. 1025.

24 citing documents.

Morettini v. Martinez 205 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
For many years, in fact, as early as 1910, , 52 So.
Jenkins v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark, NJ 83 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Fourmeaux v. Clark-Roscher Hardware Supply Co. 17 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Bodin v. Texas Co. 186 So. 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Jackson v. Cook 181 So. 195 La. 1938
Jackson v. Cook 176 So. 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Cimo v. Karstendiek 173 So. 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
of Automobile Law (Permanent Edition) page 541; , 52 So.
Iglesias v. Campbell 170 So. 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Vallery v. Teche Lines, Inc. 166 So. 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Ledet v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 160 So. 442 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Peperone v. Lee 160 So. 467 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1935
Jacoby v. Gallaher, supra; , 52 So.
Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. Landry 153 So. 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
This danger must be anticipated by the driver.” See, also, , 52 So.
Guillory v. United Gas Public Service Co. 148 So. 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Plaintiffs cite us: , 52 So.
Wyble v. Putfork 141 So. 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Defendant’s learned counsel strenuously argues that the doctrine of comparative negligence is established by article 2313 and paragraph 13 of article 3556 of the Revised Civil Code, and that the courts of this state should recognize that doctrine in assessing damages, , 52 So.
Millannos v. Fatter 138 So. 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Ziegler v. Lamantia 126 So. 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
See Burvant vs. Wolfe, , 52 So.
Buckley v. Featherstone Garage, Inc. 123 So. 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Pyaette v. N. O. Pub. Service, Inc. 120 So. 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
This has been the jurisprudence of this State since Burvant vs. Wolfe, , 52 So.
Gremillion v. Couvillion 5 La. App. 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
The evidence does not show that the roadway had been appropriated by groups or individual pedestrians, or any circumstances which required defendant to give signals of the approach of his car, or to maintain such a degree of care as would insure the safety of persons coming upon the street, as in the case cited by plaintiff (Burvant vs. Wolfe, , 52 South.
Hanley v. Anthony 3 La. App. 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
In support of the contention that the defendant is liable under the doctrine of the last clear chance, the plaintiff cites Burvant vs. Wolf, , 52 South.
Gouzien v. Feraci 2 La. App. 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
As was said in Burvant vs. Wolfe, (190), 52 South.
Mercer v. Rosenblath 100 So. 414 La. 1924
Hebert v. Baton Rouge Electric Co. 91 So. 406 La. 1922
Edmendorf v. Clark 79 So. 557 La. 1917