Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Leonard v. Garrett, 54 So. 984.
- Verzwyvelt v. Armstrong-Ratterree, Inc. 463 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Woods v. Stoma 242 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Manson Realty Company v. Plaisance 196 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Littleton 125 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
-
International Paper Co. v. Masters
103 So. 2d 557
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
See Leonard v. Garrett, 1911, , 54 So.
-
Texas Company v. O'MEARA
82 So. 2d 769
La. 1955
Civil Code, Articles 3437 and 3498; , 54 So.
- Gaylord Container Corp. v. Stilley 79 So. 2d 109 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
-
Rhodes v. Collier
41 So. 2d 669
La. 1949
All of these essentials are present in the case at bar as plaintiffs have proven actual possession 1 of a part of the tract, which extended civilly to all the land included within the boundaries as stated in the title deed of Mrs. Rhodes, Articles 3437 and 3498 of the Civil Code; , 54 So.
- Finley v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co. 16 So. 2d 839 La. 1944
-
Smith v. Southern Kraft Corporation
13 So. 2d 335
La. 1943
Civil Code, Articles 3437 and 3498; , 54 So.
- Rives v. Starcke 196 So. 657 La. 1940
- Soule v. West 170 So. 26 La. 1936
- Tremont Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co. 139 So. 12 La. 1931
- Plumb v. Hammond Lands, Inc. 134 So. 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
-
Capra v. Viola
135 So. 41
La. 1931
'535, , the court, referring to' the cases of Waddill v. Walton and Lambert v. Craig, supra, said: “Those were eases where the party invoking prescription had never had possession.
- Haas v. Currie 126 So. 547 La. 1930
- State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co. 113 So. 833 La. 1927
- Miller v. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. 63 So. 883 La. 1913