No. 18,276
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
Malbrough v. Roundtree
Malbrough v. Roundtree, 54 So. 463 (La. 1911).
Cited by
- Marshall v. Wells 381 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
- Marchand v. Estate of Loga 354 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- Jackson v. Hampton 134 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
- Succession of Hogh 190 So. 399 La. 1939
- Duplain v. Wiltz 174 So. 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
- Beauchamp v. Levy 55 So. 775 La. 1911
Opinion text
On Application for Rehearing. BREAUX, C. J. Defendants move the court to amend the opinion and judgment rendered, so as to amend and change the expression: “The defendants have no title to the interest which the father of the plaintiffs acquired in his own name from the heirs of Eulalie Malbrough. The lower court properly gave judgment to that extent.” The motion is granted. The words quoted are left out — eliminated from the opinion and judgment — and the judgment is affirmed without those words. Application for a rehearing refused.