Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ex parte Lincoln, 54 So. 818.

21 citing documents.

Powell v. Barsavage 399 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Ingargiola v. Clesi 396 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Cawthorne v. Williams 313 So. 2d 915 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Wilson v. Wilson 307 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Wren v. Wren 301 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State in Interest of Taylor 296 So. 2d 841 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Wood v. Beard 290 So. 2d 675 La. 1974
411 (1926); Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Lindsay v. Finch 240 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
not authorized to interfere with a parent’s authority over his or her children, except if the court is satisfied that he, or she, will neglect them, or expose them to improper influences, in which case the paramount interest which society has in seeing to it that they be well taken care of and properly brought up would justify the court in making some other disposition of them, Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State ex rel. Tusa v. Tusa 221 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
authorized to interfere with a parent’s authority *664 over his or her children, except if the court is satisfied that he, or she, will neglect them, or expose them to improper influences, in which case the paramount interest which society has in seeing to it that they be well taken care of and properly brought up would justify the court in making some other disposition of them, Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State ex rel. Lott v. Courtney 178 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State ex rel. Hebert v. Knight 135 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Brode v. Hatcher 97 So. 2d 422 La. 1957
Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Lombardo v. Miller 94 So. 2d 888 La. 1957
Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Martin v. Garza 46 So. 2d 760 La. 1950
not authorized to interfere with a parent’s authority over his or her children, except if the court is satisfied that he, or she, will neglect them, or expose them to improper influences, in which case the paramount interest which society has in seeing to it that they be well taken care of and properly brought up would justify the court in making some other disposition of them, Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Theriot v. Pulling 25 So. 2d 620 La. 1946
are not authorized to interfere, with a parent’s authority over his children, except if ‘the court is satisfied that he (or she) will neglect them, or expose them to improper influences, in which case the paramount interest which society has in seeing to it that they be well taken care of and properly brought up would justify the court in making some other disposition of them.’ Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Burleigh v. Savoie 171 So. 98 La. 1936
729 , in which the same question was involved, we quoted approvingly from the case of Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Perdue v. Carkuff 162 So. 729 La. 1935
s are not authorized to interfere with a parent’s authority over his children, except if “the court is satisfied that he [or she] will neglect them, or expose them to improper influences, in which case the paramount interest which society has in seeing to it that they be well taken care of and properly brought up would justify the court in making some other disposition of them.” Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
Dean v. Mizell 106 So. 534 La. 1925
In Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State Ex Rel. Herbert v. Renaud 103 So. 101 La. 1925
122 , 54 L. R. A. 927; Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 So.
State ex rel. Shutt v. Shutt 92 So. 865 La. 1922
“The father of minor children is entitled to their custody, as against the father and sister of his deceased wife, unless it appears that he will neglect them, or expose them to improper influences, in which case they will be given into the custody of others.” Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 South.
Heitkamp v. Ragan 76 So. 247 La. 1917
Ann. 751 .” Ex parte Lincoln, , 54 South.