Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schwing v. Dunlap, 58 So. 162.

15 citing documents.

Warren v. Bergeron 599 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Danos v. Richoux 356 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Sanders v. W. T. Grant Co. 55 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Davis v. Unity Life Ins. Co. 43 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
126 , and a "good deal" of latitude is generally allowed, .
Kennedy v. Item Co. 34 So. 2d 886 La. 1948
Moore v. O'Hara 8 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Maddox v. Pattison 186 So. 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
But defendants in different actions cannot be deprived of their several challenges, by the order of the court, made for the prompt and convenient administration of justice, That the three cases shall be tried together.” , 58 So.
Pastrana v. Katz 179 So. 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Jones v. Alford 172 So. 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Reeder v. Pace 171 So. 113 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Walsh v. Bertel 169 So. 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Link v. Shreveport Rys. Co. 153 So. 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
408 , , which is in line with the above reasoning: “As this court is vested with jurisdiction of the facts in a civil case, tried in the first instance by a jury, and is provided with a transcript containing the pleadings and evidence upon which the jury acted, with power to give such judgment as the evidence may warra
Driefus v. Levy 140 So. 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
498 , , 172: “There were objections to the ruling of the trial judge in the matter of the selection of jurors, and they have been considered and found to be not sufficiently well grounded to call for the reversal of the judgment, the more particularly, as the case is before this court, as made up after a protracted trial, a
Busby v. First Christian Church 95 So. 869 La. 1923
Hyatt v. Lindner 63 So. 241 La. 1913