Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Waldron, 54 So. 1009.
- State v. Smart 170 So. 2d 365 La. 1964
- State v. Defiore 92 So. 2d 717 La. 1957
- State v. Dorsey 22 So. 2d 273 La. 1945
- State v. Guillory 9 So. 2d 450 La. 1942
- State v. Goodwin 179 So. 591 La. 1938
- State v. Simmons 120 So. 612 La. 1929
- State v. Dundas 121 So. 586 La. 1929
-
State v. Toliver
113 So. 222
La. 1927
See 4 Elliott on Evidence, p. 6, § 2705; , 54 So.
- State v. Pierfax 105 So. 16 La. 1925
- State v. Foster 95 So. 536 La. 1923
-
State v. Werner
80 So. 596
La. 1918
“Under most, if not all, of the modern, statutes, the accused may become a witness if he so desires; but he is' not obliged to, and, if he does, he is, in general, subject to cross-examination and impeachment the same as any other witness, so long as his constitutional rights or privileges, not in some way expressly waived by him, are not infringed upon.” , 54 South.
- State v. Hughes 75 So. 416 La. 1917
- State v. Posey 69 So. 494 La. 1915
- State v. Joseph 68 So. 211 La. 1915
- State v. Barnes 67 So. 349 La. 1915
-
State v. Griffin
64 So. 971
La. 1914
This was on the fourth day after service of notice; but a Sunday intervened, and Sundays do not count in computing the delay for appeal ( , 54 South.
- State v. Quinn 59 So. 913 La. 1912