DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kientz v. Charles Dennery, 17 So. 2d 506.

19 citing documents.

  • The Bank of New York Mellon Fka the Bank of New York, as Trustee v. Michael E. Oldemeyer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    104, 241 (1970); Chinn v. Mitchell, 98-1060 (La.App.
  • Great American Insurance v. Marshall 355 So. 2d 1044 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Kientz v. Charles Denery, Inc., (Orleans La.App.
  • Meek v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 244 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Logue v. O'Donley 190 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Appropriate to the situation here is an observation of Judge, now Justice, McCaleb, in a dissenting opinion in Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., , 513, La.App., Orl.1944, and later quoted with approval by the Supreme Court in 209 La.
  • Gebbia v. City of New Orleans 187 So. 2d 423 La. 1966
    See Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc. (La.App.), ; Delpido v. Colony (La.App.), ; Story v. Story, Administrator (La.App.), ; McMurray v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. (La.App.), .
  • Breland v. American Insurance Company 163 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    144 , , the Supreme Court quoted, with approval, an observation made in a dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeal by Judge (now Associate Justice) McCaleb who stated ( , 513-514): "`We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
  • Doga v. United States Fire Insurance 151 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    [Kientz v. Dennery, La.App., ; 209 La.
  • Shannon v. Shreveport Transit Co. 149 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    is well-settled in our law by the jurisprudence that a motorist, including a bus operator, approaching and entering an intersection controlled by a traffic signal or a stop sign, is entitled to assume that *210 the signals will be understood and obeyed, and is not required to anticipate that other motorists will violate the law.” The dissenting opinion in Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., , (Orl.1944) contains a passage often quoted in our jurisprudence, and a reminder of the reciprocal
  • Faulkner v. Ryder Tank Lines, Inc. 135 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    144 , , the Supreme Court quoted, with approval, an observation made in a dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeal by Judge (now Associate Justice) McCaleb who stated ( , 513-514): "We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
  • Dumas v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 125 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    The only case cited by defendant is Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., , in which a wife was injured through her husband's negligence.
  • Bryant v. Ouachita Coca-Cola Bottling Company 117 So. 2d 919 La. 1960
    In these circumstances, it is vital to the public interest that the traffic rules and regulations be adhered to strictly (particularly with reference to the traffic semaphore system) as the motorist, is, to a large extent, compelled to operate his car in the belief that the law will be obeyed by others * * Kientz v. Charles Dennery, La.App., ; 209 La.
  • Moore v. Shreveport Transit Company 115 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    144 , , quoted from a dissenting opinion in the court of appeal in the same case ( , 513-514): "We are living in an advanced stage of the motor age.
  • Commercial Credit Corporation v. Morris 107 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
    144 , , in quoting from a dissenting opinion of Judge McCaleb of the Orleans Court of Appeal, now Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, in the same case as reported in , 513-514, wherein he stated: "`We are living in an advance stage of the motor age.
  • Valence v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 50 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    476 ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., ; Houghton v. Hall, 177 La.
  • Sangree v. Grilletta 42 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    A somewhat similar question was presented to us when we considered the case of Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., .
  • Sample v. Strait 36 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    " We have the observation of Judge McCaleb, in his dissenting opinon in the Kientz-Dennery case, , 513, a former judge of the Orleans Court of Appeal, now a justice of the Supreme Court, and which observation was quoted with approval by our Supreme Court in the Kientz-Dennery case, supra, thusly: "We are living in an advaced stage of the motor age.
  • Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc. 24 So. 2d 292 La. 1945
  • Fitzpatrick v. New Orleans Public Service 22 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., , and Thomas v. Roberts, La.
  • Seiner v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 18 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1944
    70 and Mrs. Virginia Culotta Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., La.App., , but that principle has application only where it appears that the conditions were such that a person exercising only slight care would have noticed the other vehicle, and that where it appears also that had the other vehicle been noticed it would have been apparent to the operator of the favored vehicle that the ope