DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dupuy v. Graeme Spring Brake Service, 19 So. 2d 657.

18 citing documents.

  • Smith v. Kepney 264 So. 3d 1214 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
    The issue of diminution of value was first recognized in the cases Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc ., (La.
  • Insured Lloyds v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 295 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    2nd Cir. 1954); Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, (La.
  • Baker v. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INSURANCE CO. 201 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1967
    Cir. 1950); rehearing refused ; Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, La.App., (Orl.
  • Foil v. Burge 196 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    257 , Dupuy v. Graeme Spring and Brake Service, La.App., , Hamilton v. Dalrymple, La.App., , Cunningham et al. v. Williamson et al., La.App., , Baillio v. Western Casualty Surety Company, La.App., , and the cases therein cited.
  • Rancatore v. Evans 182 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    2d 363 , rehearing refused ; Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, La.App., ; Gulf Ins.
  • Portier v. Marquette Casualty Co. 150 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Shields v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., La.App., ; Myers v. American Chain & Cable Co., La.App., ; Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, La.App., ; Fireman’s Fund Indemnity Company v. Sigard, La.App., ; Pearl Assurance Co. v. Reily, La.App., ; and Odum v. Newstadt’s Shoe Stores, La.App., 194 So.
  • Williams v. Langston 138 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    This Court said in Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service Inc., : “ * * * But as we now view and interpret the Hanton case and other Louisiana decisions, we think that it is clear that even though an automobile owner, whose car has been damaged by a tort feasor, has received from his insurer the total amount of his claim for damage, he may, nevertheless, maintain against the tort
  • M. Levy Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Continental Casualty Co. 106 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    84, 86 , in referring to a transaction between the insured and insurer which terminated in a settlement between them, said: “Whether the amount of such a settlement be great or small does not to any extent modify or affect the liability of the tort feasor.” See also Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc., La.App.1944, .
  • Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Kemp 102 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    decided by the Orleans Court of Appeal and particularly the following statement made by the court therein: "* * * In Louisiana the insurer is not, by the payment of the claim or a part of it, automatically subrogated pro tanto to the right of the payee against the tort feasor.
  • Buras v. Peck 83 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    In Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, La.App., , we quoted from Ayres v. Wyatt, La.App., 185 So.
  • Carter v. Middleton 76 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    Co., La.App., ; Anderson v. London Guarantee & Accident Co., La.App., ; Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, La.App., ; Vallette v. Maison Blanche Co., La.App., ; Piacun v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., La.App., .
  • Leigh v. Johnson-Evans Motors 75 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    108 , which, with the Jones and Davis cases, was cited and quoted as authority by Judge Janvier in Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service Inc., La.App., , wherein it was additionally stated: "But even where the fire is limited to the `sole and single object which formed the subject of the bailment' or `the thing which caused the injury complained of is shown to be under the management of defendant or his servants,' the burden which rests upon the bailee is not so
  • Carlson v. Eckert 73 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    84 ; Dupuy v. Craeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc., La.App., ; Clemens v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co., La.
  • Alpaugh v. Krajcer 57 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    In Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc., La.App., , citing and quoting from many authorities, we said: "* * * we think that it is clear that even though an automobile owner, whose car has been damaged by a tort feasor, has received from his insurer the total amount of his claim for damage, he may, nevertheless, maintain against the tort feasor a claim for the da
  • Day v. Roberts 55 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
    It was recognized in Dupuy v. Graeme Spring & Brake Service, Inc., , at page 659: "We realize that an automobile which is damaged in a fire or in an accident may sustain a depreciation in value in addition to specific physical damage and that even though all physical damage may be repaired, there may still remain a depreciated value merely because the car has been in a fire or in an
  • Stein v. Williams Lumber Co. 36 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
    App., , 659, is controlling.
  • Pacific Fire Ins. Co. v. Eunice Motor Car Co. 28 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , such suspicions or coincidences as are found in the testimony do not justify any definite conclusion as to any specific act of negligence.
  • Gray v. Security Storage Van Co. 26 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., ; Hanton et al. v. New Orleans C. R. Light Power Co., 124 La.