Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, 18 So. 2d 202.

15 citing documents.

  • Jackson v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 252 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    The mere fact that the injured employee is successful in obtaining employment other than in his regular occupation does not deprive him of the rights to compensation for total, Ranatza v. Higgins (La.App.
  • McAlister v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 87 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    198 , , affirming La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., Inc., La.App., ; Myers v. Jahncke Service, Inc., La.App., (writs refused).
  • Lala v. American Sugar Refining Co. 38 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
  • Anderson v. H. H. Machine Shop 32 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.
  • Jacobson v. Maryland Casualty Co. 30 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    App., ; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.
  • Arbo v. Maryland Casualty Co. 29 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
  • St. Alexandre v. Texas Co. 28 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Washington v. Independent Ice Cold Storage Co. 29 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , but all that we need find is that plaintiff was a common laborer and can no longer engage in the kind of labor in which he had earned his living prior to the occurrence of this accident, and of this we have no doubt."
  • Breland v. Rainold-Van Denburgh 24 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
  • Robinson v. Frost Hardwood Floors 25 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    198 , , 46, is a Supreme Court case affirming court of appeal, , in which the court said: "This court has held in two cases, namely, Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 174 La.
  • Henry v. Higgins Industries 24 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., , but all that we need find is that plaintiff was a common laborer and can no longer engage in the kind of labor in which he had earned his living prior to the occurrence of this accident, and of this we have no doubt.
  • Vega v. Higgins Industries 23 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
  • Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc. 23 So. 2d 45 La. 1945
  • Falgoust v. Maryland Casualty Co. 22 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    And defendant further says that, (now pending in the Supreme Court on writs of review), is correct, that authority does not control the result to be reached in this matter.
  • Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co. 21 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
    App., , now pending in the Supreme Court on writs of review, and authorities therein cited.